Goyal Traders Through Proprietor Vs Commissioner Uttarakhand State Goods And Services Tax And Others

Uttarakhand High Court 7 Nov 2024 Writ Petition Miscellaneous Single No. 2479 Of 2022 (2024) 11 UK CK 0010
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition Miscellaneous Single No. 2479 Of 2022

Hon'ble Bench

Pankaj Purohit, J

Advocates

Tarun Pandey, Tarun Lakhera

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Acts Referred
  • Uttarakhand Goods And Services Tax Act, 2017 - Section 74, 107, 107(6)(b)

Judgement Text

Translate:

Pankaj Purohit, J

1. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 07.06.2022 (annexure no.1), whereby adjudication order was passed

against the petitioner.

2. Facts of the case shorn-off unnecessary details are that the petitioner is a proprietorship firm and runs business in the field of supply of tobacco.

3. Petitioner is registered with the Uttarakhand G.S.T. Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “Act of 2017â€​).

4. The respondent-Department has conducted an audit of the petitioner-proprietorship firm for the Assessment Year 2017-18 and the impugned

adjudication order was passed when several discrepancies were found in audit of the petitioner, in particular, that the petitioner-firm has wrongly

availed the input tax credit. It is feeling aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner is before this Court.

5. Learned State counsel submits that the order impugned in the present writ petition is passed under Section 74 of Act of 2017, which is appealable,

and appeal is prescribed under Section 107 of Act of 2017 before the Appellate Authority and the petitioner can avail such remedy of appeal.

6. Learned State counsel candidly submits that the writ was entertained only for the reason that during that period no Appellate Forum was available

due to pendency of a SPA No.123 of 2022, Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Uttarakhand, but now the aforesaid special appeal has been finally decided and

avenues of the appeal are open for assessees.

7. This fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner.

8. It is also contended by learned counsel for the State that the petitioner has already filed an appeal before the Appellate Authority against the order

impugned in the present writ petition.

9. Accordingly writ petition stands disposed-off. The Appellate Authority is directed to decide the appeal of the petitioner filed under Section 107 of

the Act of 2017 against the impugned order dated 07.06.2022 (annexure no.1), within a period of three months, from the date of production of certified

copy of this order.

10. Needless to say that before disposal of the appeal, the petitioner shall deposit 10% amount before Appellate Authority under Section 107(6) and

sub-clause (b) of the Act of 2017.

From The Blog
Delhi High Court Clarifies: ‘No Coercive Measures’ Protects Only Against Arrest, Not Investigation Stay
Nov
06
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Clarifies: ‘No Coercive Measures’ Protects Only Against Arrest, Not Investigation Stay
Read More
Supreme Court Orders Compensatory Plantation on 185 Acres in Delhi Ridge by March 2026
Nov
06
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Orders Compensatory Plantation on 185 Acres in Delhi Ridge by March 2026
Read More