B.T. Laxmanashetty Vs Geethamani & Ors.

Karnataka High Court At Bengaluru 21 Nov 2024 Regular Second Appeal No. 614 Of 2020 (DEC) (2024) 11 KAR CK 0014
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Regular Second Appeal No. 614 Of 2020 (DEC)

Hon'ble Bench

Jyoti Mulimani, J

Final Decision

Dismissed

Judgement Text

Translate:

Jyoti Mulimani, J

When the case is called, the appellant is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may

affect the case.

As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 19.11.2024, on that day, when the matter was called, there was no

representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the appellant, the appeal was ordered to be listed on 21.11.2024.

The appeal is listed today. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in the year 2020. Now we are in the month of November 2024.

The appeal is pending from four years. As already noted above, when the matter is called, the appellant is not represented. It appears that the

appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Rules: Degree Title Not Mandatory If Core Subject Studied
Dec
07
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Rules: Degree Title Not Mandatory If Core Subject Studied
Read More
ITAT Slams Sexist Assumptions in Tax Order, Upholds Women’s Expertise in Business Commission Case
Dec
07
2025

Court News

ITAT Slams Sexist Assumptions in Tax Order, Upholds Women’s Expertise in Business Commission Case
Read More