Mohit Prahalad Joshi Vs Union Of India Through Ministry Of Ports, Shipping And Waterways Government Of India New Delhi & Others

Uttarakhand High Court 4 Dec 2024 Writ Petition Miscellaneous Single No. 786 Of 2023 (2024) 12 UK CK 0006
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition Miscellaneous Single No. 786 Of 2023

Hon'ble Bench

Pankaj Purohit, J

Advocates

Aayush Gaur, V.K. Kaparuwan, Rohit Arora

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Judgement Text

Translate:

Pankaj Purohit, J

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought the indulgence of this Court for quashing the order dated 14.07.2022, passed by

respondent no.2 i.e. Director General of Shipping, whereby petitioner was asked to show cause to the respondent no.2 and till then INDoS issued to

the petitioner be not blocked.

3. It is feeling aggrieved by the aforesaid show cause notice, the petitioner is before this Court.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that pursuant to the show cause notice, reply was submitted by the petitioner to the respondent

no.2 on 16.07.2022. But, the said reply has not been considered so far and the matter is pending disposal before respondent no.2. He further submits

that the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 25.08.2023 expected the Union of India to conduct the inquiry as expeditiously as possible,

but despite that order, inquiry is still pending.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner made an innocuous prayer that if a direction is issued to the respondent no.2 to conduct an inquiry within a time

bound manner, the ends of justice would be met.

6. The proposition made by learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by learned counsel for the respondents.

7. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Respondent no.2-Director General of Shipping is directed to conclude the inquiry pending against the

petitioner, pursuant to the show cause notice dated 14.07.2022, as expeditiously as possible, but not later than one month from the date of production

of certified copy of this order, by reasoned and speaking order, if already not concluded.

8. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of accordingly.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Rules: Degree Title Not Mandatory If Core Subject Studied
Dec
07
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Rules: Degree Title Not Mandatory If Core Subject Studied
Read More
ITAT Slams Sexist Assumptions in Tax Order, Upholds Women’s Expertise in Business Commission Case
Dec
07
2025

Court News

ITAT Slams Sexist Assumptions in Tax Order, Upholds Women’s Expertise in Business Commission Case
Read More