Suncity Hi Tech Infrastructures Private Limited Through Its Authorised Representative Ritesh Chauhan Vs State Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr

Delhi High Court 9 Dec 2024 Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 8489 Of 2024 & Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 32375 Of 2024 (2024) 12 DEL CK 0039
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 8489 Of 2024 & Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 32375 Of 2024

Hon'ble Bench

Chandra Dhari Singh, J

Advocates

Mohit Mathur, Giriraj Subramanium, Joy Banerjee, Veda Singh, Akhilesh Talluri, Ravi Pathak, Parmod Sharma, Reea Mehta, Siddhant Juyal, Simarpal Singh Sawhney, Vignesh, Zoheb Hossain, Manish Jain, Vivek Gurnani, Kartik Sabharwal, Kanishk Maurya, Pranjal Tripathi, Kunal Kochar

Final Decision

Dismissed

Acts Referred
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 528
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 120B, 406, 420

Judgement Text

Translate:

Chandra Dhari Singh, J.

1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR no. 13/2024, dated 6th March, 2024, registered at Police Station - Economic Offences Wing, New Delhi for offences punishable under Sections 406/420/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2. The  judgment  in  the  captioned  petition  was  reserved  on  19th November, 2024 along with a connected matter bearing number W.P.(CRL) 3369/2024 arising out of the same FIR.

3. The aforesaid writ petition, filed by one M/s Uppal Chadha Hi Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd., has been disposed of vide judgment dated 9th December, 2024, whereby, the FIR no. 13/2024, dated 6th March, 2024, registered at Police Station - Economic Offences Wing, New Delhi for offences punishable under Sections 406/420/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, along with all the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom have been quashed.

4. In view of the above, since the FIR impugned herein has already been quashed, nothing survives for further adjudication in the instant petition.

5. Accordingly, the instant petition stands disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand dismissed.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More