Sahimuddin Miyan @ Sahim Miyan Vs Babu Tauhid Ansari

Jharkhand High Court 8 Jan 2025 C.M.P. No. 1015 Of 2024 (2025) 01 JH CK 0231
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

C.M.P. No. 1015 Of 2024

Hon'ble Bench

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J

Advocates

Jitesh Kumar, Rohitashya Roy

Judgement Text

Translate:

Ananda Sen, J

1. From the pleadings of the parties and also from the argument, I find that admittedly, the petitioner has not approached the Appellate Authority.

2. The petitioner was dismissed from service vide order dated 28.07.2020 and admittedly, there is a Statutory Appellate Forum also but the petitioner

did not choose to file an Appeal, rather had approached this Court by invoking jurisdiction under 226 of the Constitution of India.

3. Considering the fact that the petitioner has an equally efficacious and alternative remedy of Appeal available, I direct the petitioner to file a regular

appeal within a period of six weeks from today before the Appellate Authority. If such Appeal is filed within the aforesaid timeframe, the Appellate

Authority will consider the Appeal of this petitioner and pass a reasoned order on the merits of the case.

4. With the aforesaid observation, this writ petition stands disposed of.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More