🖨️ Print / Download PDF

Jyotsna Bala @ Jyotsna Bala Hembram Vs State of Jharkhand

Case No: Writ Petition (S) No.4089 Of 2022

Date of Decision: Jan. 6, 2025

Hon'ble Judges: Ananda Sen, J

Bench: Single Bench

Advocate: Rahul Kumar, Kishore Kr. Singh

Final Decision: Dismissed

Translate: English | हिन्दी | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | ಕನ್ನಡ | मराठी

Judgement

Ananda Sen, J

1. The defects stand ignored.

2. Learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that in view of para-5 of the Counter Affidavit, the grievance of the petitioner has already

been redressed. He submits that his grievance in respect of pay fixation has already been redressed and part of consequential benefit has already

been paid to the petitioner.

3. He submits that he wants to withdraw this writ petition in view of the statement made in para-5 of the Counter Affidavit and the payment made to

the petitioners. For the rest grievance, he will pursue the matter with the Authorities concerned.

4. Considering his statement made above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty to approach the concerned Authority.