Anil Kumar Choudhary, J
1. Heard the parties.
2. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with a prayer to quash and set
aside the order dated 24.03.2022 passed in Criminal Revision No. 17 of 2021 whereby and where under, the learned Sessions Judge, Lohardaga has
dismissed the criminal revision preferred against the order dated 26.07.2021 passed by learned A.C.J.M., Lohardaga in Misc. Cr. Application No. 387
of 2021 whereby and where under, the learned A.C.J.M., Lohardaga rejected the prayer of the petitioner for release of tractor bearing registration no.
JH 08 H-5417 and trailer bearing registration no. JH 08 D-1861 which has been seized in connection with Bhandra P.S. Case No. 08 of 2021
corresponding to G.R. No. 271 of 2021.
3. The brief fact of the case is that consequent upon institution of the said case, a confiscation proceeding in respect of the said vehicle is going on
vide Confiscation Case No. 1/2021-22 before the Deputy Commissioner, Lohardaga which as per the supplementary affidavit dated 27.08.2024 filed
by the petitioner is still pending before the Deputy Commissioner, Lohardaga.
4. Since the confiscation proceeding is pending, the learned Sessions Judge, Lohardaga has rejected the prayer for release of the vehicle, by setting
aside the order passed by the learned ACJM.
5. Relying upon the judgment of a coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Biva Jha vs. State of Jharkhand in Cr.M.P. No. 3095 of 2013 dated
19.12.2013 it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that therein it has been mentioned that in the M.M.D.R. Act there is no provision
which prevents the Court from making the order for release of the vehicle seized in contravention of the M.M.D.R. Act. Hence, it is submitted that
the prayer as prayed for in this criminal miscellaneous petition be allowed.
6. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor on the other hand opposes the prayer and submits that the said order of the coordinate Bench was passed
before the Jharkhand Mineral (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation & Storage) Rules, 2017 came into force and Rule 11 (v) of the same
empowers the Deputy Commissioner for confiscation of inter alia any vehicle seized. Therefore, the ratio of the said judgment is not applicable in view
of the Jharkhand Mineral  (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation & Storage) Rules, 2017 coming into force. Hence, it is submitted that this
criminal miscellaneous petition being without any merit be dismissed.
7. Having heard the submissions made at the Bar and after going through the materials in the record, it is pertinent to mention here that the undisputed
fact remains that the confiscation proceeding in respect of the vehicle in question is going on before the Deputy Commissioner, Lohardaga. The
legality of the said confiscation proceeding before the Deputy Commissioner is not under challenge in this criminal miscellaneous petition.
8. Under such circumstances, this Court do not find any illegality in the order dated 24.03.2022 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Lohardaga in
Criminal Revision No. 17 of 2021 as also the order dated 26.07.2021 passed by learned A.C.J.M., Lohardaga in Misc. Cr. Application No. 387 of
2021 in connection with Bhandra P.S. Case No. 08 of 2021 corresponding to G.R. No. 271 of 2021.
9. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition being without any merit is dismissed.
