D K Ramakrishna Vs Ramalingaiah

Karnataka High Court At Bengaluru 27 Jan 2025 Criminal Appeal No. 392 Of 2015 (2025) 01 KAR CK 0853
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Appeal No. 392 Of 2015

Hon'ble Bench

Shivashankar Amarannavar, J

Advocates

Raja K P

Final Decision

Dismissed

Judgement Text

Translate:

Shivashankar Amarannavar, J

Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. There is no representation on the appellant’s side. Learned counsel for the appellant was also absent

on 19.12.2023, 29.01.2024 and 19.02.2024 On 19.02.2024, the Court has passed the following order;

Sri Srinivas.R, learned counsel for the appellant is absent.

Sri Mrutyunjaya.H, learned counsel representing Sri M.Parth, learned counsel for the respondent is present.

Due to absence of learned counsel for the appellant, the matter could not be proceeded.

This Court by order dated 29.01.2024, inspite of absence of learned counsel for the appellant, time was granted and the matter was

adjourned. The matter is listed today. However, today also there is no representation inspite of giving such opportunity to the learned

counsel for the appellant. One more opportunity is given as a last chance, failing which, further order will be passed.

List the matter after two weeks.â€​

Considering the above aspects, it appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non

prosecution.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More