🖨️ Print / Download PDF

Shailesh Kumar Vs State Of Jharkhand

Case No: Writ Petition (C) No. 6166 Of 2024

Date of Decision: Feb. 4, 2025

Hon'ble Judges: Rajesh Shankar, J

Bench: Single Bench

Advocate: Shweta Shukla,

Final Decision: Disposed Of

Translate: English | हिन्दी | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | ಕನ್ನಡ | मराठी

Judgement

Rajesh Shankar, J

1. The petitioner submits that he is an Advocate and he along with one Rishi Chandan was engaged as legal expert on payment of lumpsum amount of

Rs.98,000/- per month for a period of six months by the Department of Scheduled Tribe, Scheduled Caste, Minority and Backward Class Welfare,

Government of Jharkhand vide order as contained in memo no.1051 dated 4th May, 2023 issued under the signature of the Under Secretary of the

said department.

2. According to the petitioner, he provided his services in terms with the aforesaid order for about one month. Subsequently, vide office order as

contained in memo no.1235 dated 1st June, 2023, engagement of the petitioner as well as one Rishi Chandan was put to an end. Though the petitioner

provided his services in terms with the order dated 4th May, 2023, he has not been paid his engagement fee.

3. Having heard the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents, without entering into claim of the petitioner, he is given liberty to prefer a fresh

representation on the present issue before the respondent no.2. On receipt of the representation, the said respondent after providing opportunity of

hearing to the petitioner shall take an appropriate informed decision within four weeks from the date of filing of the representation. If the respondent

no.2 finds that the petitioner had provided his services in terms with the engagement order dated 4th May, 2023, his admissible engagement fee shall

be released in his favour within two weeks thereafter.

4. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.