Setti Uma Maheswara Rao vs State Of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC 7 Nov 2025 Criminal Petition No: 10876 Of 2025 (2025) 11 AP CK 0003
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Petition No: 10876 Of 2025

Hon'ble Bench

Dr Y. Lakshmana Rao, J

Advocates

Kakumanu Joji Amrutha Raju

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 480, 483
  • Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(c)

Judgement Text

Translate:

Dr Y. Lakshmana Rao, J

1. The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’), seeking to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.1 on bail in Crime No.295 of 2022 of S.Kota Police Station, Vizianagaram District registered against the Petitioner/Accused No.1 herein for the offences punishable under Section 8(c) read with Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for brevity ‘the NDPS Act’).

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record.

3. Mr. Kakumanu Joji Amrutha Raju, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that as on the date of issuance of the NBW against the petitioner, he was already in judicial custody. The NBW was issued on 09.05.2025, and the petitioner was produced before the learned trial Court on execution of a P.T. warrant on 19.05.2025. He has been in judicial custody for 198 days. Since the petitioner was in judicial custody in another crime, he could not appear before the learned trial Court. The Jail Authorities ought to have taken steps to produce the petitioner before the learned trial Court.

4. Considering the above fact, this Court is inclined to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.1 on bail.

5. In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed with the following stringent conditions:

i. The Petitioner/ Accused No.1 shall be enlarged on bail subject to he executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only), with two sureties each for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned I Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Sessions Judge for trial of the case under the NDPS Act, 1985, Vizianagaram.

ii. The petitioner/Accused No.1 shall appear before the learned trial Court on every adjournment without fail. If the petitioner commits any similar offence in future, the learned trial Court is at liberty to proceed in accordance with law by cancelling the bail.

iii. The Petitioner/ Accused No.1 shall not commit or indulge in commission of any offence in future.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Quashes Bihar’s Mutation Rule: Property Sale Registration Cannot Be Blocked by Extra Conditions
Nov
11
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Quashes Bihar’s Mutation Rule: Property Sale Registration Cannot Be Blocked by Extra Conditions
Read More
How Indians Can Start a Company in the USA: Step-by-Step Guide, Costs, and Legal Requirements
Nov
11
2025

Court News

How Indians Can Start a Company in the USA: Step-by-Step Guide, Costs, and Legal Requirements
Read More