Vishu Vs State Of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC 14 Nov 2025 Criminal Original Petition (MD) No. 20148 Of 2025 (2025) 11 MAD CK 0029
Bench: Single Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Original Petition (MD) No. 20148 Of 2025

Hon'ble Bench

S.Srimathy, J

Advocates

V.Karuna, E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar

Acts Referred
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023-Section 269, 309(4), 311

Cases Referred

  • (i) P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560] (link unavailable)

Judgement Text

Translate:

S.Srimathy, J

1. The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 31.10.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 309(4) and 311 of BNS, in Crime No.628 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused persons had waylaid the defacto complainant by showing knife and asked him to give money from his pocket and the same was refused by the defacto complainant. Further, the petitioner along with other accused persons had taken a sum of Rs.5,500/- from the pocket of the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court and he is in judicial custody from 31.10.2025. Hence, he seeks bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that there is one previous case pending against the petitioner. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that there is specific overtact against A1 and A2, the petitioner is arrayed as A4 and he only accompanied with A1 and also considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Kulithalai, Karur District, and on further conditions that :-

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Kulithalai, Karur District, daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Clarifies Section 27 Evidence Act: Only “Fact Discovered” Admissible, Not Entire Statement
Nov
19
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Clarifies Section 27 Evidence Act: Only “Fact Discovered” Admissible, Not Entire Statement
Read More
Bar Council of India Defends Rules Allowing Foreign Law Firms in Delhi High Court
Nov
19
2025

Court News

Bar Council of India Defends Rules Allowing Foreign Law Firms in Delhi High Court
Read More