Sivanesan Vs State Of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC 4 Dec 2025 Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (MD) No. 22249 Of 2025 (2025) 12 MAD CK 0029
Bench: Single Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (MD) No. 22249 Of 2025

Hon'ble Bench

S.Srimathy, J

Advocates

Kannan Gurusami, E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar

Acts Referred
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023-Section 326(g)
  • Explosives Act, 1884-Section 9(B)(1)(b)
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023-Section 269

Cases Referred

  • (i) P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560] (link unavailable)

Judgement Text

Translate:

S.Srimathy, J

1. The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 15.11.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 326(g) of BNSS and under Sections 9(B)(1)(b) of the Explosives Act, in Crime No. 330 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the 3rd accused took the vehicle from the petitioner along with A1 in the street of the defacto complainant's house and threw the petrol bomb on the house of the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is not present in the scene of occurrence, a false case has been given. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court and she is in judicial custody from 15.11.2025. Hence, he seeks bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner and the investigation is still pending. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Theni District, and on further conditions that :-

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

From The Blog
Supreme Court: Time-Bound Investigations Only in Cases of Undue Delay
Dec
22
2025

Court News

Supreme Court: Time-Bound Investigations Only in Cases of Undue Delay
Read More
Noida Housing Societies Face Crores in GST Notices Over Maintenance Charges
Dec
22
2025

Court News

Noida Housing Societies Face Crores in GST Notices Over Maintenance Charges
Read More