Maita Kumar Tamang @Maitay Vs Dawa Tamang

Sikkim HC 5 Dec 2025 I.A. No. 01 Of 2025 In Revision Petition 87 Of 2025/(Filing No.) (2025) 12 SIK CK 0059
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

I.A. No. 01 Of 2025 In Revision Petition 87 Of 2025/(Filing No.)

Hon'ble Bench

Meenakshi Madan Rai, J

Advocates

Jorgay Namka, Rinchen Ongmu Bhutia, Passang Tshering Bhutia, Songmit Lepcha

Judgement Text

Translate:

Meenakshi Madan Rai, J

On 30-10-2025, it was recorded by this Court that Ms. Tshering Uden Sherpa, Advocate for the Applicant had retired. She is now replaced by Learned Counsel Ms. Rinchen Ongmu Bhutia and has filed Vakalatnama.

Learned Senior Counsel for the Applicant seeks some time to file a better Affidavit with regard to the delay, in view of the fact that in Paragraph 7 reflects delay of “197 days” whereas in the prayer portion it is indicated as “99 days”.

Learned Counsel for the Respondent objects to the submissions made by Learned Senior Counsel.

Considered. In the interest of justice, let better affidavit be filed by the Applicant.

List on 20-03-2026.

From The Blog
Supreme Court: Time-Bound Investigations Only in Cases of Undue Delay
Dec
22
2025

Court News

Supreme Court: Time-Bound Investigations Only in Cases of Undue Delay
Read More
Noida Housing Societies Face Crores in GST Notices Over Maintenance Charges
Dec
22
2025

Court News

Noida Housing Societies Face Crores in GST Notices Over Maintenance Charges
Read More