Rahbar Ali Alias Rebar Ali Alias Chand Baba Vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand HC 15 Dec 2025 First Bail Application No. 2423 Of 2025 (2025) 12 UK CK 0032
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

First Bail Application No. 2423 Of 2025

Hon'ble Bench

Alok Kumar Verma, J

Advocates

Pranav Singh, Rangoli Purohit

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 2(viia), 2(xxiiia), 8, 20, 50

Judgement Text

Translate:

Alok Kumar Verma, J

1. The applicant is in judicial custody for the offence punishable under Section 8 read with Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short, “Act, 1985”) in Case Crime No.329 of 2025, registered at Police Station Kaliyar Sarif, District Haridwar.

2. According to the First Information Report dated 25.11.2025, on 24.11.2025, the applicant was apprehended by the police on suspicion. He was searched. The police recovered 102 gm. charas from the right pocket of his jacket. He was arrested at 23:55 hrs.

3. Heard Mr. Pranav Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Mrs. Rangoli Purohit, learned Brief Holder for the respondent.

4. Mr. Pranav Singh, Advocate, contended that the applicant, aged about 74 years, has been falsely implicated by the police. The alleged recovery was false. The alleged charas was not recovered from the possession of the applicant. At the time of the alleged recovery from the applicant, there was no independent witness. This fact also supports the submission of the applicant. The mandatory provision of Section 50 of the Act, 1985 was not followed. Applicant is a permanent resident of District Haridwar, therefore, there is no possibility of his absconding. He is not a convicted person, and, the alleged recovered contraband is less than commercial quantity.

5. Mrs. Rangoli Purohit, Brief Holder, has opposed the bail application orally.

6. As per Table prepared under Section 2 (xxiii-a) and Section 2 (vii-a) of the said Act, 1985, lesser than 100 gm of charas is small quantity and greater than 01 Kilogram of charas is commercial quantity (Entry No.23).

7. The object of keeping the accused in detention during the investigation is not punishment. The main purpose is manifestly to secure the attendance of the accused.

8. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion as to the merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage.

9. The Bail Application is allowed.

10. Let the applicant – Rahbar Ali alias Rebar Ali alias Chand Baba be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

From The Blog
Supreme Court: Time-Bound Investigations Only in Cases of Undue Delay
Dec
22
2025

Court News

Supreme Court: Time-Bound Investigations Only in Cases of Undue Delay
Read More
Noida Housing Societies Face Crores in GST Notices Over Maintenance Charges
Dec
22
2025

Court News

Noida Housing Societies Face Crores in GST Notices Over Maintenance Charges
Read More