Brij Bhan Singh Vs State of Haryana

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 3 Apr 2012 CRM-M-36926 of 2011 (O and M)
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

CRM-M-36926 of 2011 (O and M)

Hon'ble Bench

Rajan Gupta, J

Advocates

Sanjiv Gupta, for the Appellant; Siddharath Sarup, Dy. Advocate General, Haryana, for the Respondent

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 439#Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 120B, 193, 406, 420, 506

Judgement Text

Translate:

Rajan Gupta, J.@mdashThis is a petition u/s 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in a case registered against the petitioner under Sections 406, 420,

193, 506, 120B IPC at Police Station Chhachhrauli, District Yamunanagar, vide FIR No. 65 dated 4th June, 2011. Learned counsel for the

petitioner has argued that petitioner is in custody since 16th June, 2011. The case is triable by Magistrate. Trial of the case may take still some time

to conclude. Thus, no useful purpose will be served by detaining the petitioner any longer.

2. Learned State counsel has opposed the prayer for bail.

3. Heard. Keeping in view the period of incarceration of the petitioner, the fact that case is triable by Magistrate and the trial may still take some

time to conclude, I am of the considered view that no useful purpose will be served by detaining the petitioner any longer. Thus, without expressing

any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial

Magistrate/ Duty Magistrate, Yamuna Nagar.

From The Blog
Supreme Court: Hindu Succession Act Excludes Tribal Daughters
Oct
22
2025

Story

Supreme Court: Hindu Succession Act Excludes Tribal Daughters
Read More
Supreme Court Alarmed at 8.82 Lakh Pending Execution Cases
Oct
22
2025

Story

Supreme Court Alarmed at 8.82 Lakh Pending Execution Cases
Read More