Seema and Others Vs Amarjit Rai and Others

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 6 Mar 2002 Civil Miscellaneous No. 13061-CII of 2001 (2002) 03 P&H CK 0077
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Civil Miscellaneous No. 13061-CII of 2001

Hon'ble Bench

K.C. Gupta, J

Advocates

S.C. Chhabra, for the Appellant; A.S. Sandhu, for the Respondent

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) - Section 24

Judgement Text

Translate:

K.C. Gupta, J.@mdashAmarjit Rai, respondent, has filed a petition u/s 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, against his wife, Smt. Seema, petitioner, which is pending in the Court of District Judge, Amritsar. Smt. Seema is residing with her parents after having strained relations with her husband (respondent) at Ferozepur City. She has moved an application u/s 24 C.P.C. for transferring the said petition from Amritsar to Ferozepur as it is difficult for her to visit Amritsar on each and every date of hearing along with minor female child who is aged about two years at present.

2. It has been held by the Apex Court in Neelam Kanwar v. Devinder Singh Kanwar AIR 2000 (S.C.) 129 that convenience of the wife is to be seen. Counsel for the respondent contended that he had once visited Ferozepur City and the parents of the petitioner had tried to involve him in some criminal case and he had lodged a report to this effect. On the other hand, counsel for the petitioner contended that the marriage -of the sister of the petitioner was fixed on the next date and in order to create a scene in the marriage, the respondent had made a false application.

3. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the con venience of the wife is to be seen, the divorce petition is withdrawn from the Court of District Judge, Amritsar and is transferred to the District Judge, Ferozepur, who will try the same himself or assign to some Additional District Judge for trial in accordance with law. The parties, through counsel, are directed to appear in his Court on 21.3.2001.

From The Blog
Aishwarya Rai Bachchan Wins ₹4 Crore Tax Case at ITAT Mumbai
Nov
07
2025

Court News

Aishwarya Rai Bachchan Wins ₹4 Crore Tax Case at ITAT Mumbai
Read More
Supreme Court to Decide If Section 12AA Registration Alone Grants Trusts 80G Tax Benefits for Donors
Nov
07
2025

Court News

Supreme Court to Decide If Section 12AA Registration Alone Grants Trusts 80G Tax Benefits for Donors
Read More