Rajive Bhalla, J.@mdashPrayer in this petition, filed u/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, is for quashing of the FIR No. 231, dated
19.09.2007, registered under Sections 323, 341, 506, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 4 of the Scheduled Castes and the
Scheduled Tribes, of Atrocities Act, 1989, at Police Station City Rajpura, District Patiala, and all subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom, on
the basis of a compromise.
2. Counsel for the petitioners and counsel for respondent No. 2, the complainant, pray that as parties have settled their differences and have
executed a compromise, the FIR and all proceedings arising therefrom be quashed.
3. The complainant, Pardeep Kumar alias Montu son of Shri Ram Saran is present in Court and has been duly identified by his counsel. He
acknowledges the correctness of the compromise, the affidavit and states that he has no objection, if the FIR and all proceedings arising therefrom
are quashed.
4. Counsel for the State of Punjab submits that as the parties have entered into a compromise, the State does not oppose the prayer for quashing
of the FIR and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.
5. I have heard counsel for the parties, perused the affidavit dated 10.03.2009 and am of the considered opinion that the petitioners and
respondent No. 2 have resolved their differences by a bonafide compromise, free from any fraud, coercion or undue influence.
6. A compromise or a settlement serves the immediate purpose of the parties, as it enables them to proceed with their lives without ill-will or
rancour and in peace and harmony. In view of the compromise, the prosecution witnesses are not likely to support the prosecution and therefore to
permit the prosecution to carry on would, in my considered opinion be an exercise in futility and an unnecessary wastage of public money and
valuable Court time. A Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and Others v. The State of Punjab reported as 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 has
held that, in the exercise of powers u/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, High Court may in appropriate cases, quash an FIR disclosing the
commission of non-compoundable offences.
7. In view of what has been stated hereinabove, as the prayer for quashing of the FIR and all subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom, does
not suffer from any legal impediment, the present petition is allowed and the FIR No. 231, dated 19.09.2007, registered under Sections 323, 341,
506, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 4 of the SC/ST of Atrocities Act, 1989, at Police Station City Rajpura, District Patiala
and all consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.