🖨️ Print / Download PDF

Ram Chander Vs State of Haryana

Case No: Criminal M. No. M-8396 of 2011 (O and M)

Date of Decision: April 26, 2011

Acts Referred: Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 148, 149, 307, 323, 452

Hon'ble Judges: K.C. Puri, J

Bench: Single Bench

Final Decision: Allowed

Translate: English | हिन्दी | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | ಕನ್ನಡ | मराठी

Judgement

K.C. Puri, J.@mdashPetitioner- Ram Chander S/o Jagdish, has applied for grant of regular bail in FIR No. 240 dated 13.11.2010 under Sections

148, 149, 307, 323, 452, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Narnaul, District Mahendergarh.

2. As per allegation of the prosecution, there was a dispute between the complainant party and accused party regarding passage. On 12.11.2010

at about 4.30 P.M. Lalli Devi mother of the complainant and complainant himself were standing in front of their house. Jagdish s/o Ganpat, Sumit

s/o Jagdish, Ram Chander s/o Jagdish, Nirmala w/o Jagdish and Braham Parkash s/o Nityanand, caste Aheer, came there in their new tractor of

blue colour. Sumit was armed with axe, Nirmala was armed with jelly, Jagdish was armed with rod and Braham Parkash was armed with axe. The

tractor was being driven by Ram Chander - Applicant. It is alleged that all the abovesaid persons in active connivance of each other came to the

house of the complainant with an intention to kill them. Jagdish raised a lalkara that kill them and run over and crush them under the tractor. On

saying this, all the persons came down from tractor. Ram Chander was driving the tractor and he hit the mother of the complainant Lalli Devi with

the tractor on which she fell down. It is further alleged that Petitioner ran the tractor over the neck and head of Lalli Devi and he again reversed the

tractor and ran over Lalli Devi. It is further alleged that when complainant tried to save his mother, then an axe blow was given by Sumit on his

head which hit on the left side and Nirmala gave jelly blow on the left hand of the complainant. Then the complainant ran into his house, on this

Brahm Parkash chased him and entered his house and gave an axe blow on his back. On this they raised noise marta-marta, then son of the uncle

of complainant Jagat Singh and Manoj s/o Ramesh Chand came on the spot. On seeing them, Jagdish, Sumit, etc. said that today you people are

being saved, but we will kill you later on and they ran away from the spot alongwith their respective weapons on their tractor.

3. Nirmala and Brahm Parkash are stated to have been declared innocent. Sumit and Jagdish have been allowed the concession of bail by the

learned Sessions Judge. The reasoning given by the Sessions Judge is that it is a case of cross version and Petitioner - Ram Chander has also

suffered fracture alongwith his father.

4. Learned State counsel could not point out, from which it is made out that any injury of any of the injured was declared dangerous to life.

5. The Petitioner is in custody since 22.11.2010. In these circumstances, it is a fit case to allow the concession of bail.

6. So, bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court.