M/s. Tilak Oil and General Mills Vs State of Punjab and Another

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 26 Jul 2013 CWP No. 9579 of 1989 (2013) 07 P&H CK 0845
Bench: Division Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

CWP No. 9579 of 1989

Hon'ble Bench

Rajive Bhalla, J; Bharat Bhushan Parsoon, J

Advocates

Alok Mittal, for the Appellant; Radhika Suri, Addl. AG Punjab, for the Respondent

Judgement Text

Translate:

Rajive Bhalla, J.@mdashThe petitioner, prays for issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing order dated 18.05.1989, passed by the Assessing Authority, Mansa, (Annexure P-1) whereby the petitioner was held liable to pay central sales tax on the premise that the cotton seed oil is not edible oil. Counsel for the State of Punjab submits that the controversy, in the present petition namely whether cotton seeds oil is edible oil or not, has been decided by the Hon''ble Supreme Court in Bharat General and Textile Industries Ltd. and others Vs. State of Maharashtra and others, 1989 STC 354, by holding that cotton seed oil is not edible oil. The writ petition should, therefore, be dismissed.

2. Counsel for the petitioner despite a valiant attempt to distinguish the aforementioned judgment, is unable to do so.

3. We have heard counsel for the parties, perused the paper-book and the impugned orders. The only question raised in the petition is that as cotton seed oil is edible oil, the petitioner cannot be subjected to sale tax. The question in hand has been decided by the Hon''ble Supreme Court in Bharat General and Textile Industries Ltd. and others (supra) by holding that cotton seed oil is not edible oil. The tax liability imposed upon the petitioner by holding that cotton seed oil is not edible oil, cannot therefore, said to be illegal, void or arbitrary so as to invite interference of this Court. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed.

From The Blog
ITAT Ahmedabad Rules: Calculation Error in Section 54F Exemption Not Tax Misreporting
Nov
29
2025

Court News

ITAT Ahmedabad Rules: Calculation Error in Section 54F Exemption Not Tax Misreporting
Read More
Delhi High Court Refuses to De-Freeze Bank Account, Cites Concealment in ₹19.39 Crore GST ITC Fraud Probe
Nov
29
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Refuses to De-Freeze Bank Account, Cites Concealment in ₹19.39 Crore GST ITC Fraud Probe
Read More