Sunita Bali and Others Vs Union of India (UOI) and Others

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 27 Jan 2006 (2006) 01 P&H CK 0221
Bench: Single Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Hemant Gupta, J

Acts Referred
  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 166

Judgement Text

Translate:

Hemant Gupta, J.@mdashThe petitioners are the legal representatives of deceased Joginder Kumar who died in a motor vehicle accident on 9th November, 1998.

2. The petitioners have filed a claim petition u/s 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ambala. It has been pointed out that petitioner No. 1 has since been transferred to Chandigarh and there is none else in the family to pursue the present claim petition at Ambala. Therefore, the present case be transferred to the competent Tribunal at Chandigarh.

3. Keeping in view the contentions raised by the petitioners, the claim petition pending in the Court of Mr. J.S. Kudu, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ambala, is transferred to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chandigarh. The parties through their Counsel are directed to appear before the learned District Judge Chandigarh, on 10th March, 2006 on which date the learned District Judge shall be at liberty to entrust the petition to any claim petition Tribunal at Chandigarh.

4. The petition stands disposed of accordingly.

From The Blog
Apple Challenges Global Turnover-Based Penalties in Delhi High Court Under Competition Act
Nov
28
2025

Court News

Apple Challenges Global Turnover-Based Penalties in Delhi High Court Under Competition Act
Read More
Calcutta High Court: Written Statements Beyond 120 Days Not Allowed; Postal Service at Registered Office Valid Under CPC
Nov
28
2025

Court News

Calcutta High Court: Written Statements Beyond 120 Days Not Allowed; Postal Service at Registered Office Valid Under CPC
Read More