Sunita Bali and Others Vs Union of India (UOI) and Others

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 27 Jan 2006 (2006) 3 ACC 755 : (2006) 2 RCR(Civil) 347
Bench: Single Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Hemant Gupta, J

Acts Referred

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 166

Judgement Text

Translate:

Hemant Gupta, J.@mdashThe petitioners are the legal representatives of deceased Joginder Kumar who died in a motor vehicle accident on 9th

November, 1998.

2. The petitioners have filed a claim petition u/s 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ambala. It has

been pointed out that petitioner No. 1 has since been transferred to Chandigarh and there is none else in the family to pursue the present claim

petition at Ambala. Therefore, the present case be transferred to the competent Tribunal at Chandigarh.

3. Keeping in view the contentions raised by the petitioners, the claim petition pending in the Court of Mr. J.S. Kudu, Motor Accident Claims

Tribunal, Ambala, is transferred to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chandigarh. The parties through their Counsel are directed to appear

before the learned District Judge Chandigarh, on 10th March, 2006 on which date the learned District Judge shall be at liberty to entrust the

petition to any claim petition Tribunal at Chandigarh.

4. The petition stands disposed of accordingly.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Halts GST Assessment on Joint Development Deals
Oct
28
2025

Story

Supreme Court Halts GST Assessment on Joint Development Deals
Read More
Supreme Court Explains Demurrer Law in Neelkanth Realty Case
Oct
28
2025

Story

Supreme Court Explains Demurrer Law in Neelkanth Realty Case
Read More