Robert @ Soni Vs State of Punjab and Another

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 13 Aug 2013 Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-14546 of 2013
Bench: Single Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-14546 of 2013

Hon'ble Bench

T.P.S. Mann, J

Advocates

Rishav Jain, for the Appellant; S.S. Chaudhary, D.A.G., Punjab, for the Respondent

Acts Referred

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482#Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 380, 457

Judgement Text

Translate:

T.P.S. Mann, J.@mdashThe petitioner has filed the present petition u/s 482 Cr.P.C. so as to seek quashing of FIR No. 205 dated 12.8.2003,

registered at Police Station, Malerkotla, District Sangrur, under Sections 457 and 380 IPC and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom

on the basis of compromise. While issuing notice, this Court vide order dated 04.5.2013 directed the parties to present themselves before the trial

Court for getting their statements recorded with regard to the compromise. The trial Court was directed to record the statements of both the

parties to its satisfaction to know the genuineness that the statements were not the result of pressure or coercion in any manner. It was also

directed to send the report along with statements of the parties.

2. Report has been received from the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Malerkotla, wherein it has been stated that in compliance with the direction

issued by this Court, statements of respondent No. 2-complainant and the petitioner-accused were recorded, in which they admitted the factum of

compromise. After going through the statements made by the parties, the Court was of the opinion that they had voluntarily entered into the

compromise without any pressure or coercion. The statements of the parties have been appended with the report.

3. Both the offences alleged against the accused are non-compoundable. However, in view of the fact that the parties have since reconciled their

differences and entered into a compromise without there being any pressure or coercion and have also got recorded their statements before the

trial Court, this Court is of the view that the inherent powers u/s 482 Cr.P.C. can be safely invoked so as to quash the FIR as in all probability the

trial of the case is likely to result in fiasco. In view of the above, the petition is accepted, FIR No. 205 dated 12.8.2003, under Sections 457 and

380 IPC, registered at Police Station, Malerkotla, District Sangrur, is quashed and all the proceedings taken thereunder set aside.

From The Blog
Supreme Court to Rule on Multi-State Societies in IBC Cases
Oct
25
2025

Story

Supreme Court to Rule on Multi-State Societies in IBC Cases
Read More
Supreme Court: Minors Can Void Property Sales by Guardians
Oct
25
2025

Story

Supreme Court: Minors Can Void Property Sales by Guardians
Read More