Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Smt. Anita Arora

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 5 Jul 2001 IT Appeal No. 192 of 1999 (2001) 119 TAXMAN 10
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

IT Appeal No. 192 of 1999

Hon'ble Bench

Jawahar Lal Gupta, J; Ashutosh Mohunta, J

Advocates

R.P. Sawhney and Rajesh Bindal, for the Appellant; A.K. Mittal, for the Respondent

Final Decision

Dismissed

Acts Referred
  • Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 256(2), 260A, 271(1)(c)

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.@mdashThe revenue has filed this appeal u/s 260A of the income tax Act, 1961 (''the Act''). It challenges the order dated 22-6-1999 passed by the Tribunal in respect of the assessment year 1984-85. The following question has been posed for the consideration of this Court :

Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in upholding the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) cancelling the penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) by stating that the addition in respect of which the penalty has been levied stood deleted while the reference u/s 256(2) against the deletion of addition is pending before the High Court ?

Mr. Sawhney, the learned counsel for the revenue, very fairly states that the appeal filed by the assessee was accepted by the Tribunal and that the reference petition filed by the department was dismissed. The order of the Tribunal was affirmed by the High Court. These appeals admittedly related to the amount of taxable income.

2. Once the claim of the assessee with regard to the income has been accepted, the order regarding penalty proceedings cannot be sustained. Resultantly, Mr. Sawhney states that this appeal has to be dismissed in view of the events which have taken place subsequent to the passing of the order. Mr. Sawhney has also pointed out that a similar matter has already been decided by a Bench of this Court in income tax Appeal No. 191 of 1999 by its order dated 2-11-2000. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed. No costs.

From The Blog
SC: Brother Can Sell Father’s House Even Without Share
Oct
31
2025

Story

SC: Brother Can Sell Father’s House Even Without Share
Read More
SC to Decide If Women Can Face POCSO Penetrative Assault
Oct
31
2025

Story

SC to Decide If Women Can Face POCSO Penetrative Assault
Read More