Nirmal Singh Vs Gurdwara Sangatpura

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 26 May 2011 C.R. No. 1094 of 2011 (O and M) (2011) 05 P&H CK 0278
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

C.R. No. 1094 of 2011 (O and M)

Hon'ble Bench

Rakesh Kumar Jain, J

Judgement Text

Translate:

Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.@mdashThis revision petition has been filed against the order dated 17.01.2011 (Annexure P-5) vide which the application filed by the tenant to amend the written statement has been declined on the ground that it is to delay the proceedings.

2. Counsel for the Petitioner has submitted that in the absence of pleadings, he would not be able to lead evidence and precisely on that ground he sought the amendment.

3. At this stage, counsel for the Respondent has submitted that they would not raise any objection before Rent Controller in case the tenant leads evidence, for which the permission has already been granted by the learned Rent Controller, despite the fact that they have not pleaded the said fact.

4. This concession made by learned Counsel for the Respondent satisfies the counsel for the Petitioner.

5. In view thereof, this revision petition is accordingly disposed of.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Cracks Down on Digital Arrest Scams Using Forged Court Documents
Nov
24
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Cracks Down on Digital Arrest Scams Using Forged Court Documents
Read More
Supreme Court Sends Officer’s Choice vs Original Choice Trademark Battle to Mediation
Nov
24
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Sends Officer’s Choice vs Original Choice Trademark Battle to Mediation
Read More