Manoj Devi Vs State of Haryana

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 26 Oct 2010 Criminal Misc M-12483 of 2010 (2010) 10 P&H CK 0294
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Misc M-12483 of 2010

Hon'ble Bench

S.S. Saron, J

Judgement Text

Translate:

S.S. Saron, J.@mdashThis order will dispose of Criminal Misc M-12483 of 2009 and Criminal Misc M-14520 of 2009 filed by Manoj Devi and

Vishal -mother-in-law and husband respectively of the complainant.

2. The FIR in the case has been lodged by Ms Kanu Priya on account of a matrimonial dispute between her and her husband. It is alleged that she

was ill-treated at the house of her in-laws. Besides, the accused demanded dowry articles. Manoj Devi - mother-in-law was granted interim bail

by this Court vide order dated 6.5.2009. Thereafter, interim bail was granted to Vishal - husband on 28.5.2009. The respective Petitioners have

been joining the investigation from time to time and the dispute primarily relates to the recovery of jewellery which according to the Petitioners, the

complainant had taken while she left her matrimonial home on 24.2.2009. According to the complainant, however, the jewellery is with the

Petitioners and the same is yet to be recovered. The Police after investigation has reached the conclusion that the jewellery was taken by the

complainant when she left her matrimonial home. A reference has been made to the mobile phone calls and the SMSs to contend on behalf of the

Petitioners that the jewellery articles were taken by the complainant. The learned senior counsel appearing for the complainant has strongly refuted

the same and submitted that the said messages and telephonic conversation do not even remotely suggest that the jewellery had been taken by the

complainant.

3. These aspects, in my view, are the domain of the investigating authorities and it is for the Police authorities to ascertain and reach a conclusion as

to where the jewellery articles are.

4. Learned Counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Jagdish Chand of PS City Bhiwani has submitted that the custody of the Petitioners is

not required for the purposes of investigation as they have joined the investigation.

5. In the afore noticed circumstances, he interim bail granted to Manoj Devi on 6.5.2009 and that granted to Vishal on 28.5.2009 are made

absolute.

6. Both these petitions stand disposed of.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Halts GST Assessment on Joint Development Deals
Oct
28
2025

Story

Supreme Court Halts GST Assessment on Joint Development Deals
Read More
Supreme Court Explains Demurrer Law in Neelkanth Realty Case
Oct
28
2025

Story

Supreme Court Explains Demurrer Law in Neelkanth Realty Case
Read More