Vinod Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Others

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 19 Sep 2012 CWP No. 10816 of 2011 (2012) 09 P&H CK 0371
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

CWP No. 10816 of 2011

Hon'ble Bench

Augustine George Masih, J

Advocates

S.K. Redhu, for the Appellant; Harish Rathee, D.A.G. Haryana, for the Respondent

Judgement Text

Translate:

Augustine George Masih, J.@mdashCounsel for the petitioner states that the present writ petition has been rendered in fructuous. Ordered accordingly.

Delhi HC
Shashank Vs State (Gnct Of Delhi)
24 Nov 2025
Delhi HC
Tarun & Ors Vs Union Of India & Ors
24 Nov 2025
From The Blog
Apple Challenges Global Turnover-Based Penalties in Delhi High Court Under Competition Act
Nov
28
2025

Court News

Apple Challenges Global Turnover-Based Penalties in Delhi High Court Under Competition Act
Read More
Calcutta High Court: Written Statements Beyond 120 Days Not Allowed; Postal Service at Registered Office Valid Under CPC
Nov
28
2025

Court News

Calcutta High Court: Written Statements Beyond 120 Days Not Allowed; Postal Service at Registered Office Valid Under CPC
Read More
Quick Actions
Download PDF Open PDF in New Tab
Case Metadata
  • Ck Citation: (2012) 09 P&H CK 0371
  • Coram: Augustine George Masih, J
  • Bench: Single Bench
  • Advocates: S.K. Redhu, for the Appellant; Harish Rathee, D.A.G. Haryana, for the Respondent
Stay Updated

Subscribe for weekly highlights on judgements, legal insights, and workflow tips.