Sakshi Sehgal Vs State Bank of India

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 29 Oct 2010 Civil Revision No. 7120 of 2010 (2010) 10 P&H CK 0314
Bench: Single Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Civil Revision No. 7120 of 2010

Hon'ble Bench

Alok Singh, J

Acts Referred
  • Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) - Order 8 Rule 1

Judgement Text

Translate:

Alok Singh, J.@mdashPresent petition is filed challenging the order dated 16.09.2010 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Jalandhar, whereby defence of the defendant petitioner was directed to be struck off on account of nonfiling of the written statement within stipulated period.

2. Learned Counsel for the defendant - petitioner states that written statement is ready and shall be filed within such time as fixed by this Court. He further states that written statement could not be filed earlier because of non-availability of the counsel fee.

3. In the opinion of this Court, present petition can be disposed of at the admission stage without any notice to the respondent just to avoid undue delay in the disposal of the suit.

4. Hon''ble Apex Court in the matter of Kailash Vs. Nanhku and Others, , has held that provision of Order 8 Rule 1 C.P.C. are not mandatory rather directory in nature and on sufficient cause being shown, defendant can be permitted to file written statement after expiry of 90 days.

5. Keeping in mind, the golden rule that none of the party should be given walk over and lis between the parties, as far as possible, should be decided at its own merit after giving sufficient opportunities to both the parties to place on record pleadings, evidence and other materials required for fair adjudication of the case, I direct that defendant - petitioner shall file written statement before the learned Trial Court on or before 30.11.2010 with advance copy to the plaintiff. Defendant - petitioner herein shall pay Rs. 5,000/- as costs to the plaintiff on or before the filing of the written statement. It is made clear that no further time shall be granted to defendant in the event of non-filing of the written statement. Learned Trial Court thereafter shall proceed in accordance with law.

6. Petition shall stand disposed of accordingly.

From The Blog
Delhi High Court Clarifies: ‘No Coercive Measures’ Protects Only Against Arrest, Not Investigation Stay
Nov
06
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Clarifies: ‘No Coercive Measures’ Protects Only Against Arrest, Not Investigation Stay
Read More
Supreme Court Orders Compensatory Plantation on 185 Acres in Delhi Ridge by March 2026
Nov
06
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Orders Compensatory Plantation on 185 Acres in Delhi Ridge by March 2026
Read More