Gurjit Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 3 Sep 2013 Criminal Misc.No.26776 of 2013 in Criminal Appeal No.S-356-SB of 2013
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Misc.No.26776 of 2013 in Criminal Appeal No.S-356-SB of 2013

Hon'ble Bench

Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J

Advocates

I.S. Brar, for the Appellant; Sandeep Chhabra, DAG, for the Respondent

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred

Arms Act, 1959 — Section 25#Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 148, 149, 307, 324

Judgement Text

Translate:

Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.@mdashPrayer in this application is for suspension of sentence of appellant Nos. 3 and 4, namely, Manoj Singh @

Nikku and Sarabjit Singh @ Kukkar, respectively, who were held guilty for the offences punishable under Sections 148, 307, 324 read with

Section 149, IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, and ordered to undergo the following sentences:

All the substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. Learned counsel contends that applicant/appellant Nos. 3 and 4 have suffered incarceration for approximately two years; and that the injury

attracting the mischief of Section 307, IPC, has not been attributed to them.

3. Learned counsel for the State has produced the affidavits of the Superintendent, Central Jail, Bathinda, showing the period of incarceration

suffered by the applicants. A perusal of the same reveals that both the applicants have suffered incarceration of 01 year, 11 months and 15 days as

on date. The applicants have not been attributed the injury, attracting the mischief of Section 307, IPC. Keeping in view the totality of the facts and

circumstances of the case, the period of incarceration suffered by the applicants/appellants and the role assigned to them, the present application is

allowed. The remaining substantive sentence of applicant Nos. 3 and 4, namely, Manoj Singh @ Nikku, s/o Gulab Singh, r/o Partap Nagar, Gali

No. 29, Bathinda, and Sarbjit Singh @ Kukkar, s/o Atma Singh, r/o Chandsar Basti, Bathinda, is ordered to be suspended during the pendency

of the present appeal, subject to their furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Bathinda.

From The Blog
Minerva Mills Ltd. vs Union of India (1980)
Oct
19
2025

Landmark Judgements

Minerva Mills Ltd. vs Union of India (1980)
Read More
M.C. Mehta vs Union of India
Oct
19
2025

Landmark Judgements

M.C. Mehta vs Union of India
Read More