Rajesh Saini Vs State of Haryana

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 26 May 2014 Crl. Misc. No. M-43555 of 2013 (O&M) (2014) 05 P&H CK 0202
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Crl. Misc. No. M-43555 of 2013 (O&M)

Hon'ble Bench

Harinder Singh Sidhu, J

Advocates

Rajesh Bansal, Advocate for the Appellant; B.S. Saini, Sr. DAG, Haryana for Respondent No. 1, Advocate for the Respondent

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) - Section 482
  • Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Section 34, 406, 498-A, 506

Judgement Text

Translate:

Harinder Singh Sidhu, J.@mdashThis petition u/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed for quashing of FIR No. 3 dated 04.01.2008, registered under Sections 406 and 498-A and 506 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ''the IPC''), at Police Station NIT, Faridabad, and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 30.11.2013(Annexure P-3) arrived at between the parties.

2. Vide order dated 19.12.2013, the parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court on 07.01.2014, for getting their statements recorded. The trial Court was also directed to send the report alongwith copies of statements.

3. In compliance thereof, report of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Faridabad has been received wherein it is reported that the compromise has been arrived at between the parties. It has also been reported that statements of the parties have been recorded voluntarily and the same are without any pressure or coercion.

4. The Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the parties have amicably settled the matter, on the basis of the Compromise. He has further submitted that after the said compromise, no dispute subsists between the parties. He has further submitted that, with a view to prevent the abuse of process of Court, and in the interest of justice, the FIR aforesaid, be quashed. He also placed reliance on Kulwinder Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Another, , a judgment delivered by a Full Bench of this Court.

5. Keeping in view the ratio of law, laid down, in Kulwinder Singh''s case (supra), and applying the same to the facts and circumstances of the instant case, in my considered opinion, once the matter has been compromised, by the parties, no useful purpose, shall be served by proceeding with the prosecution.

6. For the reasons recorded above, the instant petition, u/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code, is allowed. FIR No. 3 dated 04.01.2008, registered under Sections 406 and 498-A and 506 read with section 34 IPC, at Police Station NIT, Faridabad, and the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, are quashed, qua the petitioners.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More