N.K. Ranjit Singh Vs Union of India

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 21 Jul 2014 CWP No. 6474 of 2013
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

CWP No. 6474 of 2013

Hon'ble Bench

Hemant Gupta, J; Fateh Deep Singh, J

Advocates

Navdeep Singh, Advocate for the Appellant; Mohit Malik, Advocate for the Respondent

Final Decision

Allowed

Judgement Text

Translate:

Hemant Gupta, J.@mdashThe challenge in the present writ petition is to an order passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench

Chandigarh, Chandimandir (for short ''the Tribunal'') on 31.07.2012 whereby an Original Application field by the petitioner for grant of disability

pension remained unsuccessful.

2. The petitioner while serving in 4 Sikh Regiment in Uri Sector (J & K) in the year 1996, was granted casual leave for 14 days i.e. from

12.03.1996 to 24.03.1996. However, when he was riding on a scooter along with Sepoy Bikkar Singh while on leave, suffered multiple head and

other injuries on 23.03.1996. The petitioner resumed his duties after he was medically treated at Army Hospital, Delhi in October-November,

1996 but he was invalidated out from service on 30.04.2007 without any disability pension. The petitioner was examined by Release Medical

Board. The Board opined that the injuries suffered by the petitioner is ""head injuries (operated) and Right Lateral Rectus palsy with right sided

homonymous hemianopi"". The Release Medical Board opined that the injuries were not attributable to military service since the injuries were

suffered during casual leave but opined that the injuries were declared as aggravated and connected with military service and assessed the same to

be 50% for life.

3. However, the petitioner was again subjected to Review/Appeal Medical Board. The opinion of the earlier board was reiterated except that it

was not opined that the injury is aggravated by military service. It was further reported that the injuries were caused in an accident when the

petitioner was availing casual leave. Therefore, he is not entitled to disability pension.

4. This Division Bench in CWP No. 17792 of 2013 titled as ''Barkat Masih Vs. Union of India and others'' decided on 23.05.2014, has examined

the question whether personnel of the Armed Forces, while availing casual leave suffers an injury; whether such injury can be said to be during

military service. It was held that injuries suffered by Armed Forces Personnel when on casual leave entitle the personnel for disability pension as

such injury is deemed to be attributed during military service.

5. In view of the aforesaid judgment, the present writ petition is allowed. The petitioner shall be entitled to arrears of disability pension for a period

of 3 years prior to filing of an Original Application before the Tribunal in terms of judgment in CWP No. 7277 of 2013 titled as ''Umed Singh Vs.

Union of India and others'', decided on 14.05.2014 as well.

From The Blog
Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi & Others vs State of U.P. & Others (1990)
Oct
19
2025

Landmark Judgements

Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi & Others vs State of U.P. & Others (1990)
Read More
Rustom Cavasjee Cooper (Appellant) Vs Union of India (Respondent) (1970)
Oct
19
2025

Landmark Judgements

Rustom Cavasjee Cooper (Appellant) Vs Union of India (Respondent) (1970)
Read More