Ranjeet Singh Vs State of Himachal Pradesh

High Court of Himachal Pradesh 31 Jul 2012 CWP No. 8458 of 2011-G (2012) 07 SHI CK 0082
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

CWP No. 8458 of 2011-G

Hon'ble Bench

Sanjay Karol, J

Advocates

Dalip K. Sharma, for the Appellant; Ram Murti Bisht, Dy. Advocate General, for the Respondent

Judgement Text

Translate:

Justice Sanjay Karol, J.@mdashVide Office order dated 22nd May, 2009 (Annexure P-1), petitioner was transferred from GSSS, Palampur to GMS, Bardiuk. He did not join there within time. Since there was a delay of 43 days in his joining at the place of his transfer, he applied for leave on medical grounds, which was duly sanctioned by the Principal, Government Sr. Sec. School, Aund, District Kangra vide office Order dated 7.7.2010 (Annexure P-2). The matter however did not rest there and in terms of the impugned order dated 7.7.2010, the Government took a decision that his period of leave w.e.f. 1.6.2009 to 6.6.2009 be treated as dies non (without break in service). It is this action of the respondents which has been assailed by the petitioner. The fact that petitioner did not join pursuant to his order of transfer is not in dispute. That he applied for earned leave on medical grounds for his period of absence is also not in dispute. Petitioner submitted medical record in support of his application and based thereupon, the competent authority sanctioned his leave, which is also evident from Office order dated 7.9.2009 (Annexure P-3). Petitioner has placed on record medical prescription slip to substantiate the reason of his not joining at the place of his posting. Under these circumstances, action of the respondents in converting the petitioner''s leave from that of earned leave on medical grounds to dies non cannot be said to be just and proper. It is not that no leave of the kind due was available to the petitioner. Consequently, impugned order dated 30.6.2010 (Annexure P-10) is quashed and respondents are directed to accord all benefits and release petitioner''s salary/other monetary benefits as may be found due and admissible, if any, in accordance with law. Needful be done within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this judgment, failing which, then thereafter, petitioner shall be entitled to interest @ 9% per annum on the admissible and due amounts which shall be personally recovered from the erring official(s).

Pending application(s) if any, also stand disposed of.
From The Blog
India-EU Free Trade Agreement: Zero Tariffs on Gems, Jewellery, Plastics – Why It’s Called the Mother of All Deals
Jan
28
2026

Court News

India-EU Free Trade Agreement: Zero Tariffs on Gems, Jewellery, Plastics – Why It’s Called the Mother of All Deals
Read More
Chhattisgarh High Court Denies Child Custody to Father Living with Second Wife Without Divorce
Jan
28
2026

Court News

Chhattisgarh High Court Denies Child Custody to Father Living with Second Wife Without Divorce
Read More