Rameshwar Vs State of U.P.and others

Allahabad High Court 20 Jan 2009 Writ Petition No. 310 (SS) of 2009 (2009) 01 AHC CK 0033
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition No. 310 (SS) of 2009

Hon'ble Bench

Rajiv Sharma, J

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Judgement Text

Translate:

Rajiv Sharma, J.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner claims that he is entitled for getting benefit from the date of his initial appointment and he in this regard relied on the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of B. L. Prasad and others Versus State of U.P. and others and against the said judgment S.L.P. was preferred before Hon''ble Apex Court, which has been dismissed.

The petitioner for redressal of his grievance has already represented the matter before the concerned Executive Engineer under whom he is performing and discharging his duties.

In these circumstances and in this background liberty is given to the petitioner to make a fresh representation within four weeks from today alongwith certified copy of this order before the concerned Executive Engineer under whom he is performing and discharging duties, who shall proceed to consider his claim, preferably within three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Whatever decision is taken be communicated to the petitioner.

With the above direction present writ petition is disposed of finally. No order as to costs.

From The Blog
Apple Challenges Global Turnover-Based Penalties in Delhi High Court Under Competition Act
Nov
28
2025

Court News

Apple Challenges Global Turnover-Based Penalties in Delhi High Court Under Competition Act
Read More
Calcutta High Court: Written Statements Beyond 120 Days Not Allowed; Postal Service at Registered Office Valid Under CPC
Nov
28
2025

Court News

Calcutta High Court: Written Statements Beyond 120 Days Not Allowed; Postal Service at Registered Office Valid Under CPC
Read More