Zainab Begam Vs Manawar Husain Khan and Another

Allahabad High Court 27 Apr 1886 (1886) 04 AHC CK 0008
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Tyrrell, J; Brodhurst, J

Final Decision

Allowed

Judgement Text

Translate:

Brodhurst and Tyreell, J.@mdashThe Subordinate Judge, as a first appellate Court, had the appellant''s appeal before him. On the day fixed for hearing, and on adjourned dates, the appellant did not attend in person or by pleader. The Subordinate Judge then had but one legal course open to him--to dismiss, the appeal in default (Section 556). It was illegal to try the appeal on the merits. The judgment given in this way is a nullity, and must be cancelled: its existence therefore was and is no bar to the re-admission of the appellant''s appeal (Section 558), if it was not barred by limitation or otherwise inadmissible-We must allow this appeal, and direct the restoration to the file of the application for re-admission u/s 558 on the merits, the costs of this appeal being costs in the cause.

From The Blog
Future of Law in India 2025: Why AI & Technology Skills Are Essential for Young Lawyers
Dec
24
2025

Court News

Future of Law in India 2025: Why AI & Technology Skills Are Essential for Young Lawyers
Read More
Bombay High Court Quashes ₹1,737.2 Crore Arbitral Award Against Thermax
Dec
24
2025

Court News

Bombay High Court Quashes ₹1,737.2 Crore Arbitral Award Against Thermax
Read More