Ramachandra Rau and Others Vs Kandasami Chetti and Others

Madras High Court 27 Mar 1895 (1895) 03 MAD CK 0007
Bench: Division Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Subramania Ayyar, J; Best, J

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. It has been argued on behalf of the plaintiffs that there has been no final and valid dissolution of the nidhi or company, but that is not a point that

has been referred for our consideration.

2. The question referred assumes there was a dissolution and asks whether subsequent to such dissolution Seshayyar had power to endorse the

notes.

3. Our answer to this question must be in the negative, as, with the dissolution of the nidhi, the powers of the liquidator also come to an end.

4. Cf. In re Pinto Silver Mining Co. Ch. D. 273 and In re London and Caledonian Marine Insurance Co. 11 Ch. D. 140.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More