Queen-Empress Vs Rahat Alikhan

Allahabad High Court 30 Nov 1886 (1886) 11 AHC CK 0008
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

John Edge, J

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Judgement Text

Translate:

John Edge, Kt., C.J.@mdashBy Section 16 of the Stamp Act, 1879, it is provided that "all instruments chargeable with duty and executed by any person in British India shall be stamped before or at the time of execution."

2. Sections 17 and 18 provide for the stamping of documents executed or drawn out of British India.

3. It appears to me that the first paragraph of Section 11 applies to cases in which the instrument chargeable with duty may be stamped after execution.

4. The receipt to the salary bill in question in this ease was an instrument which required to be stamped before or at the time of execution, and was not an instrument contemplated by the first paragraph of Section 11. I am consequently of opinion that there was no abetment of any offence under Sections 11 and 62 of the Act.

5. The offence which appears to have been committed was one under the second paragraph of Section 61. As it does not appear that any sanction was given u/s 69 by the Collector for a prosecution u/s 61, I do not consider it advisable to interfere further than by setting aside the conviction u/s 109 of the Penal Code and Section 62 of the Stamp Act, and directing that the fine, if realized, be refunded. It does not appear to me that Rahat Ali Khan contemplated the commission of any offence.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Questions Multiplex Food Prices: “₹100 for Water, ₹700 for Coffee”
Nov
05
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Questions Multiplex Food Prices: “₹100 for Water, ₹700 for Coffee”
Read More
Delhi High Court Upholds Landlord Heirs’ Rights, Orders Eviction of Sub-Tenants in Ownership Dispute
Nov
05
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Upholds Landlord Heirs’ Rights, Orders Eviction of Sub-Tenants in Ownership Dispute
Read More