Kamakshi Nayakan Vs Ramasami Nayakan and Another

Madras High Court 5 Nov 1896 (1896) 11 MAD CK 0016

Judgement Snapshot

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. So far as the claim for a declaration that the hypothecation bond is not binding, the action is barred.

2. As regards the rest of the claim, the mortgage and sale relied upon executed by the plaintiff''s mother and guardian are void as against him

except in so far as they can be shown to be for his, benefit or executed under circumstances otherwise rendering them binding upon him. Therefore

in this suit for possession of the property comprised in such deeds, it is unnecessary for the plaintiff to set them aside as a condition precedent to a

decree for possession We think, therefore, that neither Article 44 nor Article 91 applies.

3. We must, therefore, modify the decree of the District Judge as to the possession of the land referred to in the mortgage and sale, and direct the

appeal to be heard on the merits and disposed of according to, law. The respondents must pay and receive the proportionate costs of this appeal.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More