1. We are of opinion that the suit is not sustainable u/s 49 of the Rent Recovery Act. The prayer of the plaint is hot for damages, but for the release
and restoration of specific movable property together with some other subsidiary relief. The Revenue Court in which the suit was instituted is one
of special and limited jurisdiction and such a suit as the present will not lie u/s 49.
2. It might have been open to the plaintiff to prefer a petition u/s 32 for the release of the property--but in that case there would be no appeal.
3. The suit must therefore fail, but as this point was not taken before the District Judge, and on the facts found the conduct of the defendants has
not been free from blame, we shall not award costs in their favor.
4. The decree of the District Court must be reversed and the suit dismissed, each party bearing his own costs throughout.
