1. Section 195, Criminal Procedure Code, does not make any particular form of application for sanction necessary, nor does it enact that
application shall be made by any particular person. The section merely provides that no Court shall take cognizance of certain offences without a
sanction.
2. In the present case the sanction might have been given by the Second-class Magistrate or by some other Court to which his Court is
subordinate, and for the purpose of Section 195 that other Court is defined to be the Court to which appeals from the Second-class Magistrate
ordinarily lie.
3. u/s 407, Criminal Procedure Code, an appeal lies to the District Magistrate, but, if the District Magistrate has directed that all appeals from
Second and Third-class Magistrates in the Kallakurichi taluk shall be heard by the Deputy Magistrate--and we understand this to be the case--it
follows that all appeals from their decisions shall be presented to the Deputy Magistrate, and the Deputy Magistrate''s Court is the Court to which
the appeals ordinarily lie. Had the sanction been granted by the Second-class Magistrate the appeal would, in the ordinary course of things, have
been presented to the Deputy Magistrate as the Magistrate having jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. For this reason we consider that the view of
the Sessions Judge was correct.
4. We may point out that the order of the District Magistrate was irregular on another ground. His order directs that the accused be prosecuted
before the Head Assistant Magistrate. No such order could be passed u/s 195 which must be confined to a grant of sanction, as the District
Magistrate had no jurisdiction to act u/s 476, since the alleged offence was not brought to his notice in the course of a judicial proceeding. We
must, therefore, decline to interfere and dismiss this petition.
5. Ordered accordingly.
