Sujit Kumar Baskey Vs State of Jharkhand and Others

Jharkhand High Court 13 Mar 2008 (2008) 03 JH CK 0005
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Amareshswar Sahay, J

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

Amareshwar Sahay, J.@mdashHeard the parties and with their consent this application is being disposed of at this stage itself.

2. The prayer of the petitioner in this writ application is for direction to the respondents/authority to pay Post Retiral Benefits which is payable to the employee, such as Family Pension, Gratuity. Group Insurance cheme. Encashment of unused Earned Leave and General Provident Fund with up to date interest and the applicant also prays for a direction upon the respondents/authority to pay Penal Interest in Bank rate for deliberately delaying from the date of death of his mother to actual date of payment.

3. The petitioner''s mother died on 15.2.2004 in harness. The grievance of the petitioner is that up till now the death-cum-retiral benefit of his mother has not been paid to him in spite of the fact that he has already submitted the succession certificate.

4. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent No. 5. In para 9 of the counter affidavit it has been stated that so far as family pension is concerned, as per the law, the same is not payable to the petitioner since he has already attain the age of majority but the other lawful death-cum-retiral benefits of late Sakanti Hansda have been released in favour of the petitioner and the same is communicated to him vide letter No. 1274 dated 16.10.2007. A copy of which has been annexed as Annexure-A to the counter affidavit.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ application is being disposed of by directing the District Superintendent of Education. Deoghar (respondent No. 5) to see that the legal dues of the petitioner, as stated in the counter affidavit, is paid to him as early as possible preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. With these observations and directions, this writ application is disposed of.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Clarifies Section 27 Evidence Act: Only “Fact Discovered” Admissible, Not Entire Statement
Nov
19
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Clarifies Section 27 Evidence Act: Only “Fact Discovered” Admissible, Not Entire Statement
Read More
Bar Council of India Defends Rules Allowing Foreign Law Firms in Delhi High Court
Nov
19
2025

Court News

Bar Council of India Defends Rules Allowing Foreign Law Firms in Delhi High Court
Read More