In Re: Ponnammal

Madras High Court 14 Oct 1892 (1892) 10 MAD CK 0013
Bench: Division Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

Handley, J; Best, J

Acts Referred
  • Court Fees Act, 1870 - Section 20(II)

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. We are of opinion that the District Magistrate is right. Section 20, clause II of the Court Fees Act has reference only to fees for processes

issued in the case of ""offences,"" and it has been held that an order for payment of maintenance is not a conviction for an ""offence"" see Queen v.

Golam Hossein 2. Chowdhry 7 W.R. Cr., 10; cf. Reg. v. Thakur Ira 5 Bom. H.C.R. 81.

2. We, therefore, set aside the Head Assistant Magistrate''s order dismissing the application and direct the Magistrate to proceed with the inquiry

and pass an order in accordance with law.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More