Rajendra Singh @ Raju Singh Vs The State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court 28 Jan 2013 Criminal M.P. No. 1342 of 2012
Bench: Single Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal M.P. No. 1342 of 2012

Hon'ble Bench

Rakesh Ranjan Prasad, J

Advocates

Sanjay Prasad, for the Appellant;

Acts Referred

Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 414

Judgement Text

Translate:

R.R. Prasad, J.@mdashHeard the parties. This application has been filed for quashing of that part of the order dated 12.4.2012 whereby learned

Principal Sessions Judge, Giridih rejected the prayer for release of One Tonne of iron scrap and dismissed the revision application which had been

filed against the order dated 27.2.2012 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Giridih rejecting the prayer for release of the vehicle (Tata 207) as

well as One Tonne iron scrap.

2. It is the case of the prosecution that when a vehicle (Tata 207) bearing Registration No. JH-10Q-2305 was carrying iron scrap, it was

intercepted by the informant suspecting the iron scrap to be the stolen property and thereby a case was lodged which was registered as Giridih (T)

P.S. Case No. 104 of 2011 u/s 414 of Indian Penal Code.

3. While the matter was pending for investigation, an application was filed for release of the vehicle as well as the iron scrap whereby a report was

called for by the court concerned from the concerned Investigating Officer. On verification, the Investigating Officer reported that the documents

relating to the vehicle as also the iron scrap have been found to be genuine. In spite of that, the prayer for release of the vehicle as well as the iron

scrap was rejected by the court below.

4. Being aggrieved with that order, a revision application bearing Cr. Rev. No. 17 of 2012 was preferred before the Principal Sessions Judge,

Giridih who though passed an order for release of the vehicle but refused to release the iron scrap on the ground that still the Investigating Officer

has not verified as to whether the property belongs to the petitioner though there was a report of the Investigating Officer which has been recorded

in paragraph-8 of the order that the vehicle as well as iron scrap also belongs to the petitioner, as the documents relating to it have been found to

be genuine.

5. Under this situation, the order passed by both the courts below seems to be quite illegal. Accordingly, the same are set aside. Consequently,

One Tonne of Iron Scrap, subject matter of a case bearing Giridih (T) P.S. Case No. 104 of 2011, be released in favour of the petitioner on

furnishing security bond of Rs. 70,000/- (Seventy Thousand) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate,

Giridih.

From The Blog
Moti Ram Deka & Ors vs General Manager, N.E.F. Railways & Ors (1963)
Oct
19
2025

Landmark Judgements

Moti Ram Deka & Ors vs General Manager, N.E.F. Railways & Ors (1963)
Read More
M/s. Orissa Cement Ltd. & Others vs State of Orissa & Others (1991)
Oct
19
2025

Landmark Judgements

M/s. Orissa Cement Ltd. & Others vs State of Orissa & Others (1991)
Read More