Neelam Sharma Smt. Vs Tata Engineering and Locomotive Company Ltd. and Others

Jharkhand High Court 12 Dec 2003 M.A. No. 48 of 2003 (2004) 3 ACC 650 : (2004) 3 JCR 138
Bench: Division Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

M.A. No. 48 of 2003

Hon'ble Bench

Hari Shankar Prasad, J; Gurusharan Sharma, J

Advocates

Indrajit Sinha, for the Appellant; Alok Lal, for the Respondent

Acts Referred

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 166

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

1. Heard the parties. Admittedly, Basant Kumar Sharma, aged about .48 years, died in a motor accident on 14.4.1994. He was dashed by a Tata

Chesis, bearing registration No. BHR-16/3147/B/94, while he was going on his Luna Moped. In the proceeding, initiated u/s 166 of the Motor

Vehicles Act, 1988, at the instance of his widow and minor children, the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal, Jamshedpur considered the

evidence on record and accordingly assessed the annual dependency at Rs. 36,000/-. It was also found that at the time of final decision in the said

compensation Case No. 96 of 1994, his widow had started earning and she had her personal income and, therefore, the Tribunal applied multiplier

of 9 and calculated a sum of Rs. 3,24,000/-, payable as compensation, to the claimants under the Act.

2. In calculation of compensation under the Act, the Tribunal was to assess basically the loss of dependency, sustained by the legal representatives

of the deceased and even if, some of them had their independent income, the same was not to be taken into consideration and number of

appropriate multiplier to meet the loss of annual dependency cannot be reduced for that reason. Hence, it our opinion, the approach of the Tribunal

in applying a lower multiplier for the reason that the widow of the deceased had her independent income was not justified. In such circumstance,

applying the ratio of the decision of the Apex Court in General Manager, Kerala State Road Transport Corporation, Trivandrum Vs. Mrs.

Susamma Thomas and others, and keeping in view the age of the deceased as well as the age of the claimants, in order to meet, the loss of annual

dependency, in our opinion, the appropriate multiplier would be 11 in the present case and thus the total amount of compensation comes to Rs.

3,96,000/-, plus interest at the rate of 7% per annum, which has been granted by the Tribunal, payable from 1.10.1994 till payment.

3. This appeal is disposed of with the aforesaid observation and modification in the impugned judgment and award.

From The Blog
SC: Written Arrest Grounds Mandatory, Oral Explanation Insufficient
Oct
18
2025

Story

SC: Written Arrest Grounds Mandatory, Oral Explanation Insufficient
Read More
SC Raps Insurers for Unnecessary Appeals, Delaying Payouts
Oct
18
2025

Story

SC Raps Insurers for Unnecessary Appeals, Delaying Payouts
Read More