🖨️ Print / Download PDF

Md. Hafiz Vs The State of Jharkhand

Case No: A.B.A. No. 2841 of 2012

Date of Decision: Sept. 24, 2012

Acts Referred: Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 438(2)#Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — Section 3, 4#Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 34, 498(A), 504, 506

Hon'ble Judges: Jaya Roy, J

Bench: Single Bench

Advocate: Nitin Kumar Pasari, for the Appellant;

Translate: English | हिन्दी | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | ಕನ್ನಡ | मराठी

Judgement

Hon''ble Mrs. Justice Jaya Roy

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with the case

registered under Sections 498(A), 504, 506/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the brother-in-law (Nandoi) of the informant.

3. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. Considering the fact that the petitioner is the brother-in-law (nandoi) of the informant and

he is residing separately, the petitioner, above named, is directed to surrender in the court below within a period of one month from the date of this

order i.e. 24.09.2012. If he surrenders within the said period, the trial Court is directed to release him on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur in

connection with Jugsalai P.S. Case No. 157 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 1202 of 2012, subject to the condition that one of the bailors will

be local resident having immovable property within the jurisdiction of the District concern and also subject to the conditions laid down u/s 438(2)

of the Cr.P.C.