Y.R. TANEJA Vs DELHI BOTTLING COMPANY

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION 7 Feb 1994 1994 2 CPJ 294
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

R.N.Mittal , S.Brar J.

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. - THIS appeal has been filed by the Complainant against the order of the District Forum dated 29th October, 1992 granting him Rs. 500/- as

damages. The Complainant did not file the certified copy of the order alongwith appeal. Rule 8 of the Delhi Consumer Protection Rules provides

that each memorandum shall be accompanied by a certified copy of the order of the District Forum. Consequently, it is not an appeal in the eye of

law and liable to be dismissed on this short ground.

2. FOR the aforesaid reasons we dismiss the appeal with no order as to costs. Copy of the order be given/sent to the parties. Appeal dismissed.

From The Blog
The Automobile Transport (Rajasthan) Ltd. vs The State of Rajasthan and Others (1962)
Oct
18
2025

Landmark Judgements

The Automobile Transport (Rajasthan) Ltd. vs The State of Rajasthan and Others (1962)
Read More
The Automobile Transport (Rajasthan) Ltd. vs State of Rajasthan & Others (1962)
Oct
18
2025

Landmark Judgements

The Automobile Transport (Rajasthan) Ltd. vs State of Rajasthan & Others (1962)
Read More