Y.R. TANEJA Vs DELHI BOTTLING COMPANY

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION 7 Feb 1994 (1994) 02 NCDRC CK 0036
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Hon'ble Bench

R.N.Mittal , S.Brar J.

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. - THIS appeal has been filed by the Complainant against the order of the District Forum dated 29th October, 1992 granting him Rs. 500/- as damages. The Complainant did not file the certified copy of the order alongwith appeal. Rule 8 of the Delhi Consumer Protection Rules provides that each memorandum shall be accompanied by a certified copy of the order of the District Forum. Consequently, it is not an appeal in the eye of law and liable to be dismissed on this short ground.



2. FOR the aforesaid reasons we dismiss the appeal with no order as to costs. Copy of the order be given/sent to the parties. Appeal dismissed.

From The Blog
J&K High Court: Dealer and Manufacturer Jointly Liable for Car Defects Reported Within Warranty Period
Dec
08
2025

Court News

J&K High Court: Dealer and Manufacturer Jointly Liable for Car Defects Reported Within Warranty Period
Read More
ITAT Ahmedabad: Assessment Order Invalid Without DVO Report, Property Valuation Additions Quashed
Dec
08
2025

Court News

ITAT Ahmedabad: Assessment Order Invalid Without DVO Report, Property Valuation Additions Quashed
Read More