J.L. Kapur, J.@mdashThese petitions under Article 32 are directed against the orders made by the Assistant Sales Tax Officer, Jodhpur, calling
upon the Petitioners in the two petitions to produce their account for the years 1955-56, 1956-57 and 1957-58 for the purpose of assessment to
sales tax u/s 10 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 (Act XXIX of 1954) hereinafter referred to as the ""Act"". The Petitioner in W.P. No. 10/59
Ram Bux Chaturbhuj and some other Pan (betel leaves) sellers filed a petition in the High Court of Rajasthan challenging the notice sent to them
but that petition was dismissed by the High Court. They obtained a certificate for appealing to this Court and also obtained special leave to appeal
to this Court but subsequently withdrew the appeal and filed the present petition, i.e., W.P. No. 10/59. But the Petitioner in W.P. No. 11/59 states
that he did not file any such petition. It is not necessary in this case to decide as to the effect of the judgment of the High Court because in our
opinion these, petitions are without any substance.
2. The main contention of the petitioners is that betel leaves are vegetables and are therefore exempt from taxation under the Act. Section 4 of the
Act provides as follows:-
Section 4(1) No tax shall be payable under this Act on the sale of any of the exempted goods if the conditions specified in column 3 of the
schedule are satisfied.
(2) Where the State Government is of opinion/that it is necessary or expedient in the public interest so to do, the State Government may, by
notification in the Official Gazette, exempt from tax the sale of any goods or class of goods or any person or class of persons on such conditions
and on payment of such fee as may be specified in the notification
Section 10 of the Act deals with assessment and Schedule 2 contains the articles on which no sales tax is payable under the Act. Item 2 of that
Schedule is as follows:-
S. NO. Description of Goods Conditions and exceptions
subject to which expection is
allowed.
2. Fresh fruits, sugarcane, Ex (1) any medicine prepared
vegetable , onions and garlic, from any one or more of such
vegetable and flowerseeds, articles and (2) when any such
bulbous plants, excluding article is sold in sealed
orchids containers.
The inclusion in this item of onions, garlic, etc. along with fresh fruits, sugarcane and vegetables indicates the use of the word ""vegetables"" in its
popular sense of vegetables grown in the kitchen garden for use for the table. Moreover this word ""vegetables"" is not defined in the Act and in
274142 , which has been decided today it has been held that the word ""vegetables"" does not include pan (betel leaves). Therefore betel leaves are
taxable under the provisions of the Act.
3. It was next submitted that the notification dated April 1, 1958, which exempts betel leaves from the imposition of sales tax on the condition that
the dealer holds a valid certificate of exemption on payment of Rs. 10/- annual fee is an indirect method of levying the tax and is an imposition
without the authority of law which contravenes Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. This contention is equally without force because
Section 4(2) of the Act itself provides for conditional exemption ""on payment of such fee as may be specified in the notification"". As said above
betel leaves are not within the word ""vegetables"" and are therefore taxable. There is no discrimination between persons similarly placed. By making
a distinction between persons selling betel leaves and those selling vegetables no infringement of Article 14 is established. As it is a valid fee it
cannot be said that it is an infringement of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.
4. We therefore dismiss these petitions with costs. One hearing fee.
