Dr. S. Rajaseekaran (II) Vs Union of India & Ors.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA 30 Nov 2017 W.P.(C) No 295 of 2012
Bench: Division Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

W.P.(C) No 295 of 2012

Hon'ble Bench

Madan B. Lokur, J; Deepak Gupta, J

Advocates

KRISHNA KUMAR

Acts Referred

<a href=3998>Constitution of India</a>, <a href=3998-32>Article 32</a> - Remedies for enforcement of rights conferred by this Part#<a href=2221>Motor Vehicles Act, 1988</a>, <a href=2221-215>Section 215(3)</a>, <a href=15711-215>Section 215(3)</a> - Road Safety Councils and Committees#<a href=3676>Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989</a>, <a href=3676-Rule 126>Rule 126</a>

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. In this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution Dr. S. Rajaseekaran, an orthopaedic surgeon, a public spirited citizen and President of the",,,,

Indian Orthopaedic Association has, inter alia, prayed for enforcement of road safety norms and appropriate treatment of accident victims.",,,,

2. The petitioner states that in his capacity as Chairman and Head of Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ganga Hospital, Coimbatore, he",,,,

witnesses daily, the acute loss of life and limbs caused by road accidents. He suggests that practical measures need to be taken in a time-bound",,,,

and expeditious manner to give effect to legislations, reports and recommendations for ensuring that the loss of lives due to road accidents is",,,,

minimized. The petitioner estimates that 90% of the problem of deaths due to road accidents is the result of a lack of strict enforcement of safety,,,,

rules on roads and strict punishment for those who do not obey rules. The petitioner has relied upon data published in December 2011 by the,,,,

Ministry of Road Transport and Highways in its publication captioned `Road Accidents in India 2010'' to indicate that the number of road,,,,

accidents is increasing every year and that unfortunately more than half the victims are in the economically active age group of 25-65 years.,,,,

3. Since the petitioner has no personal interest in the matter, the writ petition filed by him was taken up as a public interest litigation.",,,,

4. Initially, the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways opposed the writ petition but as the litigation progressed, the matter was looked at in a",,,,

non-adversarial manner and considered as one in public interest.,,,,

5. In view of the non-adversarial stance of the Government of India, this Court passed an order on 22nd April, 2014 constituting a Committee on",,,,

Road Safety under the Chairmanship of Justice K. S. Radhakrishnan, a former judge of this Court. The Committee was notified by the Ministry of",,,,

Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) of the Government of India on 30th May, 2014 and orders finalizing the terms and conditions of",,,,

appointment of the Chairperson and Members of the Committee were issued on 8th August, 2014.",,,,

6. In compliance with the orders of this Court and notwithstanding bureaucratic delays and without having been provided adequate infrastructure,,,,

and staff, the Committee commenced its work in earnest from 15th/16th May, 2014. The Committee has since submitted 12 reports to this Court",,,,

but it is not necessary at present to deal with all these reports.,,,,

7. On 10th April, 2015 we recognized the exemplary work being done by the Committee and expressed the view that its recommendations need",,,,

to be seriously discussed and debated. This was in the context of the fact that the number of deaths due to road accidents in the country was said,,,,

to be over 100,000 in a year, which translates to about one death every three minutes and that the compensation awarded for deaths and other",,,,

motor accident claims runs into hundreds of crores of rupees.,,,,

8. However, it appeared to us that various State Governments were not responding positively to the recommendations made by the Committee",,,,

and accordingly the Secretary of the MoRTH was directed to call a meeting of his counterparts from all the States and Union Territories on or,,,,

before 31st May, 2015 to deliberate on the reports prepared by the Committee as well as its recommendations, their implementation and further",,,,

measures that could be taken.,,,,

9. We also noted that despite the lapse of a considerable period of time, the Government of India was unable to provide adequate facilities to the",,,,

Committee even though a letter was sent by the learned Attorney General for India on 19th December, 2014 to the Revenue Secretary and the",,,,

Urban Development Secretary of the Government of India. We are mentioning this fact only to highlight the casualness with which the Government,,,,

of India was taking the directions of this Court, in spite of the importance of the work being carried out by the Committee and its non-adverserial",,,,

stance. We may mention here that as of now, we have been informed that the Committee has been provided with all necessary facilities and",,,,

support by the Government of India.,,,,

10. In the hearing on 26th August, 2016 we noted that in 2014 the number of persons who had died in road accidents was 139,671 and that this",,,,

figure had jumped up in 2015 to 146,133.",,,,

11. Since we were informed by Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, Advocate who was requested to assist us as Amicus Curiae that the State Governments",,,,

were still not cooperating with the Committee, we had no option but to again direct the Transport Secretaries of all States to attend a meeting to be",,,,

convened by the Secretary of the MoRTH on 7th September, 2016. We had to, perforce, set the agenda for the meeting, that is, implementation",,,,

of the recommendations of the Committee, keeping in mind the very large number of deaths taking place.",,,,

12. On 19th September, 2016 we noted that in the meeting chaired by the Secretary of the MoRTH convened on 2nd September, 2016 (instead",,,,

of 7th September, 2016) only two or three Secretaries of the concerned Transport Ministries of the State Governments had participated and the",,,,

rest of the State Governments were represented by junior officials and in some cases even the designation of these junior officials was not,,,,

mentioned.,,,,

13. During this hearing, we sought to impress upon all concerned that road safety issues should be taken seriously both by the Central Government",,,,

as well as by the State Governments. We also noted that huge amounts running into hundreds of crores of rupees had been earmarked for road,,,,

safety and it was also highlighted that a very large number of deaths had been taking place due to road accidents. We noted that the insurance,,,,

companies had spent an amount of Rs. 11,480 crores by way of compensation for deaths, injuries, third party property damage and other damage",,,,

due to road accidents during the financial year 2015-16.,,,,

14. On 7th November, 2016 we again noted that there was one death almost every three minutes as a result of road accidents. Unfortunately, the",,,,

legal heirs of half the victims were not compensated (perhaps being unaware of their entitlement). We expressed our distress at this unfortunate,,,,

situation and had to remind all concerned that we were not dealing with an adversarial issue but a public interest litigation for the benefit of the,,,,

common man particularly for the victims of road accidents and their legal heirs.,,,,

15. On 11th April, 2017 we were informed by the learned Amicus that the Government of India had woken up to the problems faced due to road",,,,

S.

No.","Issue contained in note of

Amicus Curiae","Views by Ministry of Road Transport

& Highways",Orders prayed by the AC,

i.,"Road Safety Policy: Every

State Government shall

implement State Road Safety

Policy formulated as a result of

the intervention of the Committee

on Road Safety. The said Policy

may be notified in the gazette

and brought into existence w.e.f.

1st September, 2017, if not

already done so.","Ministry of Road Transport & Highways

is in agreement with the suggestion.

All the States/UTs except Assam,

Delhi, Nagaland, Tripura, Lakshadweep,

Dadra Nagar Haveli and Andaman &

Nicobar have already formulated their

Road Safety Policy.

The States / UTs which have not

formulated the Road Safety Policy, have

been requested to formulate the policy

on priority basis.","Order Proposed: The States /

UTs which have not formulated the

Road Safety Policy may be

directed to formulate the policy on

priority basis, latest by 31st

December 2017. The statement

made by the Government of India

may kindly be taken on record and

ordered.",

ii.,"State Road Safety Council: All

State Government (except

Nagaland) have constituted State

Road Safety Council as required

under Section 215 of the Motor

Vehicles Act, 1988 and directed

by the Committee. The said

Council must undertake periodic

meetings to review the actions

and implementation of road

safety laws and submit suitable

reports to the competent

legislature and the Committee on

Road Safety.","Ministry of Road Transport & Highways

is in agreement with the suggestion. All

States / UTs except Daman & Diu,

Dadra Nagar Haveli and Andaman &

Nicobar have already constituted State

Road Safety Councils.","Order proposed: All States / UTs

except Daman & Diu, Dadra Nagar

Haveli and Andaman & Nicobar

have already constituted State

Road Safety Councils. The others

may be directed to constitute the

same as per the

recommendations of the

Committee on Road Safety.

The Statement made by the

Government of India may kindly be

taken on record and ordered.",

iii.,"Lead Agency: Each State

Government may be directed to

establish a Lead Agency as

required by the Committee on

Road Safety headed by a senior

officer and with adequate staff to

be solely dedicated to matters

relating to licensing, issuing of

driving licences, and registration

of vehicles, road safety, and

features of vehicles, pollution and

other allied matters.","Ministry of Road Transport & Highways

is in agreement with the suggestion.

Ministry held review meeting with the

States to review the implementation of

the directions of the Committee on Road

Safety from 27th to 30thJune, 2017. The

States / UTs were requested to

establish Lead Agency and depute

adequate, dedicated and professional /

technical staff. Few States viz.

Chhattisgarh, Daman & Diu, Haryana,

Jharkhand, Jammu & Kashmir,

Nagaland, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu have

already established the Lead Agency.","Order proposed: The States /

UTs that have not established

Lead Agency, as defined and

required by the Committee on

Road Safety and depute adequate,

dedicated and professional /

technical staff may be directed to

do so by 31st December 2017 as

per the standards set by the

Committee on Road Safety. The

statement made by the

Government of India may kindly be

taken on record and ordered.",

iv,"Road Safety Fund: Pursuant to

recommendations of the

Committee on Road Safety all

the States have commenced or

completed action to set up a

Road Safety Fund with assured

flow of money as desired by the

Committee. However, in such

States where it has not come

into place it must come into

effect w.e.f. 1st September 2017.","Ministry of Road Transport & Highways

is in agreement with the suggestion.

Some of the States viz. Bihar,

Chhattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh,

Jharkhand, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh,

Puducherry, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh

have established dedicated fund as per

directions of Committee on Road Safety.

During the review meeting held by the

Ministry, the remaining States / UTs

have been requested to create the Road

Safety Fund as per the directions of the

Committee on Road Safety.","Order Proposed: The States

/UTs that have not constituted the

Road Safety Fund may be

directed to establish the same as

soon as possible and not later

than March, 2018 and report to the

Committee on Road Safety. The

statement made by the

Government of India may kindly be

taken on record and ordered.",

v,"Road Safety Action Plan:

State Governments may be

directed to formulate and notify

Road Safety Action Plan" with

an annual target for reducing

road accident with effect from a

date not later than 1st

September 2017.","Ministry of Road Transport & Highways

is in agreement with the suggestion.

During the review meetings held by the

Ministry, the States / UTs have been

requested to prepare the annual target

based Action Plan to reduce accident &

fatality rate in pursuance of directions of

Committee on Road Safety.","Order Proposed: The States /

UTs may be directed to prepare

the annual target based Action

Plan to reduce accident & fatality

rate in pursuance of directions of

Committee on Road Safety and

the report to the Committee.",

,,,,

,,,,

vi,"District Road Safety

Committee: All State

Governments may be directed to

constitute District Road Safety

Committee headed by the

Collector of the District which will

fix targets for reduction in

accidents and fatality dependent

upon peculiar facts of the

District. As suggested in the

written Note, District Road

Safety Committee could include

Superintendent of Police, Health

Officers, PWD Engineers,

representatives of NHAI and RTO

of the District.","Ministry of Road Transport & Highways

is in agreement with the suggestion.","O r d e r proposed: State

Governments may be directed to

constitute District Road Safety

Committee headed by the

Collector of the District as soon as

possible lay down responsibilities

o f said committees, including

regular and periodic meeting and

report to the Committee on Road

Safety. The statement made by

the Government of India may

kindly be taken on record and

ordered.",

vii,"Engineering Improvement:

The Amicus Curiae submits that

one of the main reasons for

accidents is poor quality of

roads, improper design,

inadequate curve, inadequate

depth and inadequate angle

which need to be maintained at

crucial junctions. At the instance

o f the Committee on Road

Safety, the MoRTH has set up

protocol for identification and

rectification of black spots. The

said protocol for rectifying black

spots for better road safety is

annexed herewith as Annexure

„B? pages (28 to 29). This

Hon''ble Court may be pleased to

direct that the same be enforced

into immediate effect by the

NHAI, the Ministry of Road

Transport & Highways of

Government of India as well as

the PWD Departments of all

State Governments as well their

contractors. It is important that

the same is also enforced in all

expressways being constructed

on PPP mode.","The Ministry is in agreement with the

suggestion. However, the protocol has

to be reviewed and updated from time to

time based on the experience gained.","Order proposed: Protocol for

Identification and Rectification of

Black Spots prepared by MoRTH

at the instance of Committee on

Road Safety may be directed to

be implemented by all concerned

including NHAI and State

Governments in consultation with

the Committee on Road Safety.

It may be clarified that the said

protocol would be reviewed and

updated by MoRTH annually

based on the experience gained.

The statement made by the

Government of India may kindly be

taken on record and ordered.",

viii,"Traffic Calming Measures:

This Hon''ble Court may further

direct the State Governments to

adopt Traffic Calming Measures

at accident prone areas,

junctions of lower hierarchy

roads and other vulnerable spots

like schools, hospitals, etc.","Ministry of Road Transport & Highways

is in agreement with the suggestion.","Order proposed: This Hon''ble

Court may direct that the State

Governments should adopt Traffic

Calming Measures at accident

prone areas, junctions of lower

hierarchy roads with higher

hierarchy roads and other

vulnerable spots like schools,

hospitals etc., and submit district

wise compliance reports to the

Committee on Road Safety, as per

the directions of the Committee on

periodic basis. The statement

made by the Government of India

may kindly be taken on record and

ordered.",

,,,,

,,,,

ix,"Roads Safety Audits: This

Hon''ble Court may direct State

Governments to carry out road

safety audits during design,

construction and operation of

roads and also in respect of

existing roads within a specified

time frame. This audit must be

carried out by auditors

accredited by National Road

Safety Audit Board. This

National Road Safety Audit

Board must consist of Senior

Officers of the NHAI, MoRTH, of

respective State Governments as

well as Road Safety Experts who

are trained Road Safety

Auditors. It is respectfully

submitted that if roads were

properly constructed and

maintained in this country, as is

d o n e in many overseas

countries, road accidents would

be much less.","In-principle, the Ministry is in agreement

with the suggestion. However, there is a

deficiency of qualified auditors in road

safety engineering in the country. Efforts

are being made by the Government to

build capacity, by way of organizing

workshops on road safety engineering,

road safety audit certification courses

etc. It would take some time to build up

capacity in the field of road safety audit.

Therefore, States may be permitted to

set their own targets for completing the

road safety audits, as per the guidelines

issued by the Ministry from time to time.

With regard to the recommendation of

accreditation by National Road Safety

Audit Board, it is stated that a proposal

to create a National Road Safety Board

has been incorporated in the Motor

Vehicle (Amendment) Bill, 2017. The bill

has been passed by Lok Sabha. The

proposed Board will deal with all

aspects of the road safety.","Order proposed: This Hon''ble

Court may be pleased to direct the

Central Government to:

(i) Conduct audit of 2 most

accident prone stretches of

highways/expressways in each

State as a pilot programme, and

present strategies for reducing the

accidents;

(ii) build capacity and train at least

150 more auditors within the

period of next one year;

The State Governments/UTs may

be directed to train at least 25

such auditors within the period of

next one year, and thereafter

conduct audits.

The statement made by the

Government of India may kindly be

taken on record and ordered.",

x,"Engineering Design of New

Roads: It may be directed by

this Hon''ble Court that no new

road/project costing more than

Rs . 10 Crores should be

undertaken unless the design is

audited and the audit

recommendation are

implemented to the satisfaction

of the aforementioned National

Road Safety Audit Board.","The road projects costing Rs. 10.00

crore or more may be of different types

like re-surfacing of the road,

reconstruction of bridges / culverts,

construction of retaining walls for

protection of roads etc. Such projects

do not require the road safety audit.

Therefore, specifying only cost criteria

for carrying out road safety audits is not

appropriate.

It is proposed that the road safety audit

including the design stage audit should

be carried out for all road capacity

augmentation projects of 5 km or more.","Order proposed: It is prayed that

this Hon''ble Court may be pleased

to direct the road safety audit

including the design stage audit

should be carried out for all road

capacity augmentation projects of

5 km or more.",

xi,"W o r k i n g Group on

Engineering: it is prayed that

this Hon''ble Court may pass an

order directing that

recommendations of the Working

Group on Engineering as

directed by this Hon''ble Court

(marked as Annexure "C" pages

(30 to 38)) be implemented

forthwith as directed by the

Hon''ble Court.","The report of the Working Group on

Engineering (Roads) contains a detailed

background discussion. The

recommendations and suggested

policies are contained in Para 4 of the

Working Group Report. Many of these

recommendations are in the nature of

general comments.

In view of the above, appropriate

recommendations based on Working

Group Report which can be passed by

Hon''ble Supreme Court as directions

are brought out as below:

- Highways and urban road design

standards and guidelines will be made

consistent with the safety requirements

and in tune with the international best

practices on a continuous basis at

regular intervals.

- Road safety audits at different stages

should be carried out depending on the

size / type of the project for all the road

development projects.

- All road improvement projects including

resurfacing works should have provision

of signs & markings as per the

requirements.

- Adequate traffic calming measures

should be taken, wherever necessary, to

enhance safety of vulnerable road users.

- Existing stretches of National

Highways & State Highways not covered

in development projects on modes like

BOT/EPC should be subjected to Road

Safety Audits in phased manner through

a time bound programme.

- Recommendations of Road Safety

Audits should be implemented,

preferably within 2 years of submission

of audit reports.

- Standard Road accident recording &","Order proposed: This Hon''ble

Court may issue the following

directions as set out as below:

1. Highways and urban road

design standards and guidelines

will be made consistent with the

safety requirements and in tune

with the international best

practices on a continuous basis at

regular intervals.

2. Conduct Road safety audits at

different stages of construction

and operation.

3. All road improvement projects

including resurfacing works should

have provision of signs & markings

as per the requirements.

4. Adequate traffic calming

measures should be taken,

wherever necessary, to enhance

safety of vulnerable road users.

5. Recommendations of Road

Safety Audits should be

implemented, before further work

is undertaken on the road

concerned.

6. Standard Road accident

recording & reporting formats

should be evolved considering all

aspects of feasibility and

manpower resources and be

published as standard documents

for adoption by all authorities at

Central and State levels.

7. Specialized accident

investigation centres shall be

established to study a few

selected accidents using accident

reconstruction techniques etc.,

and the details to be preserved in

a data base.",

,,,,

,,,,

,,"reporting formats should be evolved

considering all aspects of feasibility and

manpower resources and be published

as standard documents for adoption by

all authorities at Central and State

levels.

- Specialized accident investigation

centres shall be established to study a

few selected accidents using accident

reconstruction techniques etc., and the

details to be preserved in a data base.

- Institutionalized system of database

storage and management should be

developed for road accident data. A

suitable web based electronic road

accident data collection/compilation

system shall be developed for

countrywide implementation.

- Centre of excellence for road safety

Research & Accident analyses should

be developed in academic institutions

across the country.

- Establishing synergy between various

stake holders (road authorities,

academia, enforcement authorities,

health authorities etc) in road safety at

central/ state levels is being strived

through National Road Safety Council

and State Road Safety Councils. These

should be strengthened and made

robust to deliver the intended results.

- Centre is extending support to Road

Safety Engineering improvements on

state roads through specific schemes to

act as benchmarks and models for

further efforts by states. 10% of Central

Road Fund (CRF) allocations have been

earmarked for Road Safety Engineering

works on state roads through Central

Road Fund (State Roads) Amendment

Rules, 2016. Detailed guidelines have

also been issued in this regard.","8. Institutionalized system of

dat abas e storage and

management should be developed

for road accident data. A suitable

web based electronic road

accident data collection/

compilation system shall be

developed for countrywide

implementation.

9. Centre of excellence for road

safety Research & Accident

analyses should be developed in

Academic institutions across the

country.

Till such time as the NRSB

becomes operational, the above

steps may be taken by the

Government in consultation with

the Committee on Road Safety.",

xii,"Drivers'' Training: This Hon''ble

Court may be pleased to issue a

direction that licenses of all

drivers would be renewed after

every five years and would be

subject to their qualifying the

stringent criteria including

technical efficiency, quality of

driving, control over a vehicle and

other relevant factors. It is

necessary that any person who

drives the vehicle must be in

complete control of the vehicle to

be able to minimize the risk of

an accident.

It is submitted that only

accredited driving schools should

be authorized to impart training

to the learners and recommend

the grant of permanent licenses.

Such institutions must have

driving teachers (a) with not less

than 10 years'' experience; (b)

who have experience in driving all

kinds of vehicles; (c) who have

the the requisite learning vehicle;

(d) who have adequate facilities

and take suitable number of

tests before the final license by a

public authority should only be

upon recommendation of such

an accredited licensing

institution. Computerized driving

tests should be resorted for

checking driving skills.","In the Motor Vehicle (Amendment) Bill,

2017, it is proposed that the transport

driving license is to be renewed at an

interval of five years.

It has been proposed in the Motor

Vehicle (Amendment) Bill, 2017 that the

Central Government may make rules for

such schools or establishments. The

efforts shall be made to improve the

quality of driving training by prescribing

detailed curriculum as well as the

infrastructure and trainer requirements

by the Driving Training Schools.","O r d e r proposed: The

Government of India and the State

Governments may be directed to

take such steps as recommended

by the Committee on Road Safety

in a time bound manner to ensure

improvement in the quality of driver

training and licensing (including

emphasis on lane driving) as well

as in the infrastructure and the

trainer requirements.",

,,,,

,,,,

xiii,"Lane Driving: This Court may

issue a direction that all the

State Government would issue a

mandatory circular that lane

driving will be strictly insisted

upon in all parts of this country.

Further, overtaking shall be only

according to the protocols which

are devised for the said purpose

and contravention may even

result in forfeiture of his or her

license.","Ministry of Road Transport & Highways

has already notified Motor Vehicles

(Driving) Regulations 2017 vide G.S.R.

634 (E) dated 23rd June 2017 which

mandates the lane driving and also

provides for the protocol for overtaking.","Order proposed: The State

Governments/ UTs may be

directed to strictly implement

Motor Vehicles (Driving)

Regulations 2017 notified vide

G.S.R. 634 (E) dated 23rd June

2017 which mandates the lane

driving and also provides for the

protocol for overtaking.",

xiv,"Road Safety Equipment: All

the State Governments will take

steps to acquire and use

cameras and other surveillance

equipment according to the

norms suggested by the Ministry

of Home Affairs to check and

detect traffic violators. Further,

this Hon''ble Court may direct

that special patrol forces along

the National Highways,

Expressways and the State

Highways be established. The

States may also be directed to

take the following actions to the

satisfaction of the Committee on

Road Safety:

(A) Formulate and enforce a

policy for the removal of all

hoardings and objects which

obstruct driving or distract

drivers.

(B) Formulate and enforce a

policy for detection and removal

of encroachment on all

pedestrian path which will cause

any hindrance to pedestrians

and vehicles.

(C) Issue a direction that all

driving licenses will be

suspended for a period of at

least one year under Section 19

of the Motor Vehicles Act and

Rule 21 of the CMV for over

speeding, red-light jumping, use

of cellular phone while driving,

over loading, and using goods

carriage for ferrying passengers.","Bureau of Police Research &

Development (BPR&D) had prepared a

report in consultation with States/UTs

on the norms for the number of Traffic

Police and also for the Equipment for

identifying violations of traffic laws with

reference to vehicle population of that

City/State and submitted the same to

the Committee on Road Safety in the

month of September, 2015. Further,

Committee on Road Safety has

forwarded the report to all States/UTs on

30th November, 2015 (copy attached in

Annexure-II)","Order Proposed: All the State

Governments/UTs may be directed

to take steps to acquire and use

cameras and other surveillance

equipment according to the norms

suggested by the Ministry of

Home Affairs in a phased manner

to check and detect traffic

violators; and may further be

directed to set up special patrol

forces along the National

Highways, Expressways and the

State Highways. This may be

done in consultation with and to

the satisfaction of the Committee

on Road Safety.",

xv,"Alcohol and Road Safety: As

per the order dated 15th

December 2016, by a judicial

order passed in (State of Tamil

Nadu v. K. Balu, 2017(1) R.C.R.

(Civil) 1029 : 2017(1) Recent

Apex Judgments (R.A.J.) 586 :

(2017) 2 SCC 281) this Hon''ble

court prohibited the grant of

licences for the sale of liquor

along national and state

highways and over a distance of

500 metres from the outer edge

of the highway throughout the

territory of India. This Hon''ble

Court may further direct the

State Governments to ensure

that the said prohibition imposed

by this Hon''ble Court be

effectively implemented. Further,

those found driving under the

influence of alcohol should be

prosecuted under the Motor

Vehicles Act, 1988 as well as

under the Indian Penal Code,

1860 within a time period fixed

by this Hon''ble Court.","Ministry has written to the States vide

letter dated 6th April, 2017, for

compliance of the orders of the Hon''ble

Supreme Court. Ministry of Home Affairs

had issued an advisory on road safety

and accidents to all the States/UTs on

17th December, 2015, advising for strict

enforcement of provisions of IPC and MV

Act to prosecute and punish persons

causing injury or death in offences

related to road safety (detail attached in

Annexure-III).","Order proposed: No further

orders are required at this stage.

The statement made by the

Government of India may kindly be

taken on record and ordered.",

,,,,

,,,,

xvi,"R o a d Safety Education:

Pursuant to recommendations of

the Committee on Road Safety,

Road Safety Education has

already been included by CBSE

in school curriculums. This

Hon''ble Court may further direct

the State Governments to ensure

that Road Safety Education and

Counselling is also incorporated

into the curriculum of the State

Boards.","The Ministry of Road Transport &

Highways is in agreement with the

suggestion.","Order proposed:This Hon''ble

Court may further direct the State

Governments/UTs to ensure that

Road Safety Education and

Counselling is also incorporated

into the curriculum laid down by

the State Boards by 1st April,

2018.The statement made by the

Government of India may kindly be

taken on record and ordered.",

xvii,"Speed Governors: It is prayed

that State Governments be

directed to take steps to ensure

that approved speed Governors

are fitted in the existing transport

vehicles and given Unique

Identification Number. These

numbers should be uploaded in

the VAHAN Database along with

the details of the vehicle. The

instructions issued by

Committee on Road Safety in

this regard may kindly be

directed to be strictly followed.","Ministry of Road Transport & Highways

has already issued guidelines for fitment

of approved Speed Limited Device

(speed governors) on transport vehicles.

The suggestion to upload the Unique

Identification Number of the Speed

Governor in the VAHAN database is

acceptable.","O r d e r proposed: State

Governments be directed to take

steps to ensure that approved

speed Governors are fitted in the

existing transport vehicles and

given Unique Identification

Number. These numbers should

be uploaded in the VAHAN

Database along with the details of

the vehicle. The instructions

issued by Committee on Road

Safety in this regard may kindly

be directed to be strictly followed.",

xviii,"Emergency Medical Care: As

far as emergency care is

concerned, this Hon''ble Court

may direct that the State

Government shall establish for

every District at least one

Trauma Care Centre with all

modern medical facilities, and

ambulances equipped with first-

aid facility manned by trained

para-medical staff should also be

made available.","I n respect of the Trauma Care

Programme being implemented by

Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, a

total number of 116 Trauma Care

Facilities (TCFs) were identified and

approved during the 11th Five Year Plan

(FYP) and 81 TCFs were identified

during the 12th FYP. It may further be

mentioned that with regard to trained

para-medical staff for ambulances, the

Programme Division, the Director

General of Health Services has

developed the Pre-hospital Trauma

Technician Course curriculum, and the

training is being undertaken in the three

Central Government Hospitals of Delhi,

namely Safdarjung Hospital, LHMC and

Dr. RML Hospital since 2007.","Order proposed: This Hon''ble

Court may direct that the State

Government shall establish for

every District at least one Trauma

Care Centre with all modern

medical facilities, and ambulances

equipped with first-aid facility

manned by trained para-medical

staff should also be made

available. Further, District

Magistrates of every district may

be directed to ensure that

sufficient publicity is given in

respect of existing facilities.",

xix,"Universal Accident Helpline

Number: This Hon''ble Court

may be pleased to order that

there shall be one Universal

Accident Helpline Number which

should be established by the

Department of

Telecommunication throughout

the country. Further, a universal

code for ambulances should be

notified by the MoRTH.","The National Health Mission already

provides for a call centre number (108),

which is being extensively used in the

States for medical emergencies

including accidents. The ambulance

services are also operational in most of

the states through this call centre

number (108).","Order Proposed: The State

Governments/UTs may be directed

to strengthen the accident helpline

number by providing adequate

facilities. The State Governments

that have not made ambulance

services operational may be

directed to do so by 31st March

2018, and to further develop a

code/method to utilize services of

all ambulances in the area.",

xx,"Permanent Road Safety Cell:

This Hon''ble Court may direct

that National Highways Authority

of India must have a permanent

Road Safety Cell consisting of

suitable engineers and qualified

personnel and which shall be

established on or before 30th

September, 2017.","The Ministry of Road Transport &

Highways is in agreement with the

suggestion.

Ministry of Road Transport & Highways

as well National Highways Authority of

India have established road safety

engineering cells. All the States/UTs

have also been requested to establish

Road Safety Engineering Cell in their

National Highways Directorates by

Ministry of Road Transport & Highways.","Order Proposed: The cells have

been set up and no further orders

are required at present. The

statement made by the

Government of India may kindly be

taken on record and ordered.",

xxi,"Data Collection: This Hon''ble

Court may direct that a

computerized format be prepared

by the MoRTH for collecting road

accident data throughout the

country and data so collected

should be made public so that

even members of the public

could pursue remedial actions or

research.","Ministry of Road Transport & Highways

has already evolved a new format for

recording accident data & report. The

format is enabled for computerized data

entry. State Government / UTs have

been asked to take further action to

collect and report the data in new

format. The Ministry has been making

the data public for information of all the

stakeholders.","Order proposed: No further

orders are required at this stage.

However, it may be directed that

the said format evolved by the

Ministry be strictly followed. The

statement made by the

Government of India may kindly be

taken on record and ordered.",

,,,,

,,,,

xxii,"GPS: It is submitted that it has

been found that use of GPS and

GIS mapping encourages safety

both for drivers and passengers.

Therefore, it is prayed that a

direction be issued to all car

manufactures that with effect

from 1st January 2018 they

would ensure that all vehicles are

installed with GPS and GIS.","Ministry of Road Transport & Highways

has already notified vide G.S.R. No.

1095 (E) dated 28th November 2016

mandating the fitment of vehicle location

tracking device and emergency button in

all public service vehicles except two

wheelers, e-rickshaw, three wheelers

and any transport vehicles for which no

permit is required under the Motor

Vehicles Act, 1988. Fitment of GPS

devices on other vehicles would be

considered in due course since this

would put additional cost burden on the

vehicle owners in terms of cost of the",,"Order proposed: This Hon''ble

Court may direct that all public

service vehicles shall be fitted with

location tracking device as

mentioned by GoI and the said

notification be strictly

implemented. The statement

made by the Government of India

may kindly be taken on record and

ordered.

xxiii,"Bus/Truck-Body Building

Code: This Hon''ble Court may

direct that MoRTH may take

suitable steps to notify

Bus/Truck-Body Building Code

so that henceforth buses and

trucks built on different chassis

are not found wanting in security

and safety features.","GPS equipment.

Bus Body Code: Ministry of Road

Transport & Highways has already

notified the bus body code vide G.S.R.

No. 287 (E) dated 22nd April 2014.

Truck Body Code: Ministry of Road

Transport & Highways has already

notified the truck body code vide G.S.R.

No. 1034 (E) dated 2nd November 2016

for vehicles registered on or after 1st

October 2018.",,"Order proposed: No further

orders are required at this stage.

The statement made by the

Government of India may kindly be

taken on record and ordered.

xxiv,"ABS, Air Bags and Headlights:

It is prayed that a direction be

issued that in every model of car

sold in India there shall be Anti-

Lock Braking System and air

bags. Further a direction be

issued that all two-wheeler

manufacturer will take recourse

t o "Automatic Headlights On

systems. It is prayed that a

direction be issued that the

State Government must not

allow vehicles with impermissible

headlights to ply.","ABS: Ministry of Road Transport &

Highways has notified for the fitment of

ABS in motor cycles vide G.S.R. No.

310 (E) dated 16th March 2016 and for

four wheelers vide G.S.R. No. 120 (E)

dated 10th February 2017 for new

models on or after 1st April 2018 and for

existing models on or after 1st April

2019.

Air Bags: Ministry of Road Transport &

Highways finalized a standard AIS-145,

which is being notified. This standard

would mandate fitment of Air Bags on all

the LMV passenger vehicles.

Automated Headlights On: Ministry of

Road Transport & Highways has notified

vide G.S.R. No. 188 (E) dated

22.02.2016 for fitment of „Automated

Headlights On'' (AHO) in two wheelers

manufactured on or after 1st April 2017.",,"Orders proposed: No further

orders are required.

xxv,"Crash Test: It is respectfully

submitted that in view of the

doubtful crash test of all the

LMVs, crash test in proper

conditions must be undertaken

in respect of LMVs by

laboratories that are accredited.

It is submitted that this Hon''ble

Court may further direct that all

vehicle testing agencies in India

should be internationally

accredited / recognized to

ensure that crash tests are

genuinely and sincerely

undertaken having utmost regard

to the value of human life. This

may be done by 1st April 2018.","The crash tests for all the Light Motor

Vehicles (LMVs) have been notified by

the Ministry for implementation. The

tests are to be conducted only by the

testing agencies notified under Rule 126

o f the Central Motor Vehicle Rules,

1989. The agencies are required to have

their testing facilities accredited by

National Accreditation Board for Testing

and Calibration Laboratories (NABL).

The Ministry has issued S.O. 1139 (E)

dated 28.04.2015 and S.O. 2412 (E)

dated 03.09.2015 amending the Central

Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 (CMVRs)

notifying the following crash standards: -",,"Order proposed: No further

orders are necessary at this

stage. The statement made by the

Government of India may kindly be

taken on record and ordered.

,,Standards,"Date of

commencement/

validity",

,,"Requirement for

behaviour of steering

mechanism of a

vehicle in a Head-on

Collision as per AIS

096/2008","N e w Models-

1.10.2017

All Models-

01.10.2019",

,,"Prot ect ion of

occupants in the

event of an offset

Frontal Collision as

per AIS 098/2008","N e w Models-

1.10.2017

All Models-

01.10.2019",

,,,,

Approval of vehicles N e w Models-

with regard to the 1.10.2018 All

Protection of Models-

Occupants in the 01.10.2019

event of a Lateral

Collision as per AIS

099/2008

Approval of Vehicles N e w Models-

with regard to the 1.10.2018

Protection of All Models-

Pedestrian and 01.10.2020

o t h e r Vulnerable

Road Users in the

event of a Collision

with a Motor Vehicle

as per AIS 100/2010",,,,

,,,,

,,"Approval of vehicles

with regard to the

Protection of

Occupants in the

event of a Lateral

Collision as per AIS

099/2008","N e w Models-

1.10.2018 All

Models-

01.10.2019",

,,"Approval of Vehicles

with regard to the

Protection of

Pedestrian and

o t h e r Vulnerable

Road Users in the

event of a Collision

with a Motor Vehicle

as per AIS 100/2010","N e w Models-

1.10.2018

All Models-

01.10.2020",

10. Engineering Design of New Roads: The MoRTH is of the view, and the learned Amicus is also in agreement, that the Road Safety",,,,

Audit as mentioned above should include the design stage audit of new road projects of 5 kms or more, rather than being based on the cost",,,,

of the project. It is ordered accordingly.,,,,

11. Working Group on Engineering: The Working Group on Engineering (Roads) has already submitted a Report which is available with,,,,

the Road Safety Committee as well as the MoRTH. This Working Group was constituted pursuant to the decision taken in the meeting of,,,,

the 12th National Road Safety Council held on 25th March, 2011. The recommendations of the Working Group should be implemented in",,,,

the terms prayed for by the learned Amicus as well as those accepted by the MoRTH. These will, of course, be in the nature of interim",,,,

directions since the National Road Safety Board is likely to be created as proposed in the Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Bill, 2017.",,,,

12. Drivers'' Training: This is the subject matter of the Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Bill, 2017 and no orders are required to be passed",,,,

in this regard.,,,,

13. Lane Driving: The MoRTH has already issued Motor Vehicles (Driving) Regulations, 2017 vide G.S.R. 634 (E) dated 23rd June,",,,,

2017.,,,,

The Notification should be implemented by the State Governments and Union Territories strictly.,,,,

14. Road Safety Equipment: The Bureau of Police Research and Training has already prepared a Report on the subject and has,,,,

submitted it to the Road Safety Committee in September, 2015. The recommendations in the Report should be implemented including",,,,

acquisition of cameras and surveillance equipments in detecting traffic and identifying violators. It is also necessary to set up special patrol,,,,

forces along the National Highways and State Highways for which necessary steps must be taken by the State Governments and Union,,,,

Territories.,,,,

15. Alcohol and Road Safety: The MoRTH has already written to the States to comply with orders of this Court in this regard. The,,,,

MoRTH may issue further advisories in this regard on a quarterly basis during the calendar year 2018 so as to serve as a reminder to the,,,,

State Governments and Union Territories to implement the directions of this Court.,,,,

16. Road Safety Education: The learned Amicus as well as MoRTH are in agreement that road safety education and counselling should,,,,

be incorporated in the curriculum by the State Boards by 1st April, 2018. It is directed that the State Governments may seriously consider",,,,

this recommendation and include Road Safety Education and Counseling as a part of the school curriculum at the earliest.,,,,

17. Speed Governors: Guidelines in this regard have already been issued by the MoRTH. The MoRTH has agreed to upload the Unique,,,,

Identification Number of the speed governors in the VAHAN database. This should be followed up by the MoRTH with expedition.,,,,

18. Emergency Medical Care: There is agreement that at least one Trauma Care Centre should be set up in every district with necessary,,,,

facilities and an ambulance. The State Governments and Union Territories should take up this recommendation at the earliest since it is on,,,,

record that treatment soon after a road accident is crucial for saving the life of the victim. In this context, it may also be mentioned that this",,,,

Court has issued certain directions in Pt. Parmanand Katara v. Union of India, 1990(2) R.C.R.(Criminal) 75 : (1989) 4 SCC 286 which",,,,

should be followed.,,,,

19. Universal Accident Helpline Number: The MoRTH has stated that there is already a call centre number, that is, 108 provided by the",,,,

National Health Mission. Due publicity must be given to this so that an ambulance can be activated at the earliest whenever necessary.,,,,

20. Permanent Road Safety Cell: All State Governments and Union Territories have already been requested by the MoRTH to set up,,,,

Road Safety Cells. The State Governments and Union Territories should establish Permanent Road Safety Cells by 31st January, 2018.",,,,

21. Data Collection: The MoRTH has already taken steps for recording accident data and reports through computerised data entry. The,,,,

State and Union Territories have been asked to take further action in this regard and make the data public for the information of all,,,,

stakeholders. This needs to be followed up and no further orders are necessary in this regard.,,,,

22. GPS : The MoRTH has already notified vide G.S.R. No. 1095 (E) dated 28th November, 2016 mandating the fitment of vehicle",,,,

location tracking devices in all public service vehicles subject to some exceptions. Since this has cost implications, the MoRTH may assist",,,,

the State Governments and Union Territories to ensure that to the maximum extent possible and within the shortest time frame, location",,,,

tracking devices must be fitted in all public service vehicles as notified.,,,,

23. Bus/Truck-Body Building Code: This has already been notified by the MoRTH with regard to buses vide G.S.R. No. 287 (E) dated,,,,

27th April, 2014 and with regard to trucks vide G.S.R. No. 1034(E) dated 2nd November, 2016. No further orders are necessary in this",,,,

regard.,,,,

24. ABS, Air Bags and Headlights: The MoRTH has already notified for fitment of ABS in motor cycles vide G.S.R. No. 310(E) dated",,,,

16th March, 2016 and for four wheelers vide G.S.R. No. 120(E) dated 10th February, 2017. As far as air bags are concerned a standard",,,,

AIS-145 has already been notified. As regards automated headlights, the MoRTH has notified vide G.S.R. No. 188(E) dated 22nd",,,,

February, 2016 for fitment of ""Automated Headlights On"" in two wheelers manufactured on or after 1st April, 2017. No further orders are",,,,

required in this regard except the faithful implementation of the various notifications issued by the MoRTH.,,,,

25. Crash Test: This too has been notified by the MoRTH and the test for all light motor vehicles is required to be conducted by the testing,,,,

agency notified under Rule 126 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989. No further orders are required in this regard except the faithful",,,,

implementation of the notifications and crash standards issued by the MoRTH.,,,,

18. We make it clear that the directions given above are those that have been agreed upon by the parties before us and are in addition to and,,,,

supplement the directions already given in S.Rajaseekaran v. Union of India, (2014) 6 SCC 36. We commend the efforts put in by the learned",,,,

Amicus Curiae and the Justice K.S. Radhakrishnan Committee on Road Safety. We are confident that the directions given above, at their instance",,,,

and with the support, cooperation and assistance of the MoRTH, will save thousands of lives in road accidents and crores of rupees in",,,,

compensation payable by the insurance companies - provided the directions are faithfully and sincerely complied with.,,,,

19. We also make it clear that if there is any doubt or clarity required in implementing the directions given, the concerned State Government or",,,,

Union Territory is at liberty to move the Committee on Road Safety.,,,,

20. We may note that none of the directions given by us or the directions given earlier by this Court are difficult to comply with. In this connection,",,,,

we may draw attention to the excellent document prepared by the Committee on Road Safety and the MoRTH titled ""Consulting Services to Audit",,,,

the Implementation by the States of the Directions Issued by the Committee on Road Safety - Group 4- Final Report"" concerning Haryana",,,,

prepared in September 2017. The Report has received considerable support from the Delhi Integrated Multi-Model Transit System Limited,,,,

(DIMTS), Transportation Research and Injury Prevention Programme (TRIPP), IIT-Delhi and The Energy and Resource Institute (TERI). It",,,,

would be worthwhile if similar reports are prepared and published so that roads all over the country are rendered far safer than what they are,,,,

today.,,,,

21. List for further proceedings on 7th February, 2018.",,,,

From The Blog
Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi & Others vs State of U.P. & Others (1990)
Oct
19
2025

Landmark Judgements

Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi & Others vs State of U.P. & Others (1990)
Read More
Rustom Cavasjee Cooper (Appellant) Vs Union of India (Respondent) (1970)
Oct
19
2025

Landmark Judgements

Rustom Cavasjee Cooper (Appellant) Vs Union of India (Respondent) (1970)
Read More