@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER
A. Gopal Reddy, J.@mdashThe petitioner claims to be owner of land to an extent of Ac. 1-14 cents in Survey No. 233, Thokatta (Chinna
Thokatta) village. Trimulgherry Mandal, Hyderabad having purchased under a registered sale deed dated 3-5-1982 vide document No. 1183 of
1982. It is further stated that pursuant to directions of this Court in W.P. 12407 of 2002 the Mandal Surveyor of the office of second respondent
has surveyed the entire survey No. 233 and fixed boundary stones. It is alleged that the 4th respondent society through its men got removed and
shifted some of the boundary stones and trying to illegally encroach on the petitioner''s land. In the said circumstances, the petitioner society has
addressed a letter dated 21-7-2003 to the first respondent seeking permission to lay a fencing around its land. Since, no action was taken,
petitioner society addressed another letter dated 28-12-2003 seeking permission to construct a compound wall. It is further alleged that the 4th
respondent is trying to encroach upon the petitioner''s land and filed the present writ petition.
2. It is well settled that boundary disputes between two private parties cannot be a subject matter of the writ petition and remedy of civil suit
cannot be replaced by writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner society may take such steps to stop the
constructions of the 4th respondent and may approach the concerned authorities to reconsider the sanctioned lay out, but it cannot invoke the
jurisdiction of this Court to resolve such disputes.
3. The apex Court in Mohan Pandey and Another Vs. Smt. Usha Rani Rajgaria and Others, has held as follows:
It has repeatedly been held by this Court as also by various High Courts that a regular suit is the appropriate remedy for settlement of disputes
relating to property rights between private persons and that the remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution shall not be available except where
violation of some statutory duty on the part of a statutory authority is alleged.
4. In the circumstances, the appropriate remedy for the petitioner is to approach the Civil Court and take steps to protect its property and establish
its right over the property.
5. Subject to above, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
