K. Jayaraj Vs Executive Officer, Cantonment Board

Andhra Pradesh High Court 8 Jan 2004 Writ Petition No. 558 of 2004 (2004) 01 AP CK 0007
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition No. 558 of 2004

Hon'ble Bench

C.V. Ramulu, J

Advocates

R.K. Suri, for the Appellant; Deepak Bhattacharjee, SC, for the Respondent

Final Decision

Dismissed

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

C.V. Ramulu, J.@mdashThis writ petition is filed seeking writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not releasing the balance subsistence allowance payable to the petitioner during the period of suspension i.e., from 28-11-2000 to 27-5-2003 as arbitrary and illegal.

2. Earlier, the petitioner was removed from service and he was imposed punishment with retrospective effect. On appeal filed by the petitioner, the appellate authority on 26-11-2003 had modified the said order of dismissal to be effected from 27-5-2003 and the subsistence allowance already paid to him shall not be recovered. Even against this order, the petitioner filed a revision before the revisional authority. At this stage, the petitioner filed present writ petition and complains that his subsistence allowance during the pendency of the enquiry by the disciplinary authority was not paid as per law. Such a petition is not maintainable and he is supposed to work out the remedies either in the appeal or in the revision petition pending before the revisional authority. The writ petition is misconceived and it is, accordingly, dismissed.

From The Blog
CBDT Cracks Down on Bogus Deduction Claims: Taxpayers to Get SMS and Email Alerts
Dec
16
2025

Court News

CBDT Cracks Down on Bogus Deduction Claims: Taxpayers to Get SMS and Email Alerts
Read More
Gujarat High Court: Myopic Reading of Sections 129 & 130 of CGST Act Would Create Hostility
Dec
16
2025

Court News

Gujarat High Court: Myopic Reading of Sections 129 & 130 of CGST Act Would Create Hostility
Read More