COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs ANDHRA PRADESH LIGHTINGS LTD.

Andhra Pradesh High Court 24 Aug 1998 24 August 1998 Reference Case No. 72 of 1990 (2000) 109 TAXMAN 337
Bench: Full Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

24 August 1998 Reference Case No. 72 of 1990

Hon'ble Bench

T. Ranga Rao, J; S. V. Maruthi, J; Ms. S. V. Maruthi, J

Advocates

S. R. Ashok, for the Revenue, S. Ravi, for the Assessee, for the Appellant;

Acts Referred

Income Tax Act, 1961 — Section 263, 32A

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

Maruthi, J. -

At the instance of the revenue, the following question was referred for the opinion of this Court:

Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in holding that electric bulb was

not a domestic electrical appliance appearing at Item No. 12 of the XI Schedule, entitling the assessee to Investment Allowances in respect of

machinery employed in the manufacture of electric bulbs?

2. The facts in brief are as folllows :

The assessee is a company carrying on business in the manufacture of electric bulbs. The assessment year is 1979-80. The assessee claimed

investment allowance at 25 per cent of the cost of the plant and machinery which was Rs. 92,81,994. The claim of investment allowance came to

Rs. 23,20,498. The main contention of the assessee is that the electric bulbs do not fall under Item No. 12 of the XI Schedule. The Income Tax

Officer disallowed the investment allowance claimed by the assessee. On appeal, the Commissioner allowed the same, agreeing with the assessee

that electric bulbs do not fall under Item No. 12 of the XI Schedule. For the assessment years 1980-81 and 1981-82, the Income Tax Officer

allowed the claim of the assessee. The Commissioner revised the assessment u/s 263, on the ground that allowing the claim of the assessee for

investment allowance u/s 32A of the Act is prejudicial to the revenue. On a further appeal by the department against the order of the

Commissioner for the assessment year 1979-80 and by the assessee for the assessment years 1980-81 and 1981-82 the Tribunal held that electric

bulbs are not domestic electrical appliances falling under ltem No. 12 of the XI Schedule and, therefore, the plant and machinery of the assessee is

eligible for investment

3. The question, therefore, is whether the assessee is entitled for investment allowance u/s 32A in respect of the plant and machinery involved in the

manufacture of electric bulbs. To consider the issue, it is necessary to refer to section 32A and Item No. 12 of the XI Schedule Section 32A reads

as follows:-

Investment allowance.-(1) In respect of a ship or an aircraft or a machinery or plant specified in sub-section (2), which is owned by the assessee

and is wholly used for the purposes of the business carried on by him, there shall, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this section,

be allowed a deduction, in respect of the previous year which the ship or aircraft, machinery or plant is first put to use in the immediately

succeeding previous year, then, in respect of that previous year, of a sum by way of investment allowance equal to twenty-five per cent of the

actual cost of the ship, aircraft, machinery or plant to the assessee :

** ** **

(2) The ship or aircraft or machinery or plant referred to in sub-section (1) shall be the following, namely :-

(a) ** ** **

(b) any new machinery or plant installed after the 31st day of March, 1976,-

and (ii)** ** **

in any other industrial undertaking for the purposes of business of construction, manufacture or production of any article or thing, not being an

article or thing specified in the list in the Eleventh Schedule:

Item No. 12 of the X1 Schedule reads as follows :

12. Domestic electric appliances, not falling under any other item in this list.

Explanation.-`Domestic electrical appliances'' means electrical appliances normally used in the household and similar appliances used in places,

such as, hotels, restaurants, hostels, offices, educational institutions and hospitals.

A reading of section 32A read with Item No. 12 of the XI Schedule makes it clear that investment allowance is not permissible in respect of Item

No. 12 of the XI Schedule. In other words, an assessee is not entitled to claim investment if his plant and machinery is used for the manufacture of

domestic electrical appliances. A domestic electrical appliance is explained as an electrical appliance normally used in the household and similar

appliances used in places such as, hospitals, restaurants, hostels, offices, educational institutions and hotels. Therefore, if an electric bulb is normally

used in the household and hotels, etc., then the plant and machinery will not be entitled for the allowances u/s 32A. The question, therefore, is

whether the electric bulb is used as a domestic electrical appliance.

4. The learned standing counsel appearing for the revenue relying on Star Radio Electric Co. Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax, Gujarat, contended

that as long as the bulb is capable of rendering the desired service, it is a domestic electrical appliance and constitutes a domestic electrical

appliance and, consequently the assessee is not entitled for the investment allowance.

5. He also relied on a judgment of the Gujarat High Court in Vishwa and Co. Vs. State of Gujarat, , wherein electric fans were held to be

domestic electrical appliances within the meaning of Entry 52 of Schedule B of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953.

6. Before considering whether the electric bulbs are domestic electrical appliances within the meaning of Item No. 12 of the XI Schedule, we will

deal with the judgments relied on by the learned standing counsel for the revenue.

7. In Viswa & Co.''s case (supra), the Gujarat High Court was interpretating Entry 52 of Schedule B of the Bombay Sales Tax Act which was

defined ill the following manner : ''domestic electrical appliances other than torches, torch cells and filament lighting bulbs''. Since Entry 52 of

Schedule B excludes filament lighting bulbs, the judgment is not relevant for deciding the instant case. Further, there is no explanation as in the case

of XI Schedule. Therefore, the judgment in Viswa & Co.''s case (supra) is not applicable to the facts of this case.

8. In Star Radio Electric Co.''s case (supra), while considering whether the fluorescent tube without a choke and a starter is a domestic electrical

appliance within the meaning of Entry 52 of Schedule B to the Bombay Sales-tax Act, 1953, the Gujarat High Court held as follows:

if a starter and a choke are found essential for obtaining the desired service, namely, the dispelling of darkness and the supply of fluorescent light

through 1he fluorescent tube, then a fluorescent tube without a starter and a choke cannot fall within Entry 52 of Schedule B to the Bombay Sales

Tax Act, 1953, as amended, but if it is found that a starter and a choke or either of them are not essential for achieving the desired object through

the fluorescent tube, then the presence of both or the one which is not essential for achieving the desired object would not he necessary to bring the

fluorescent tube within the ambit of Entry 52."" In our view, this judgment is not relevant. It is not enough if the article is capable of rendering the

desired service in order to fall within the meaning of Item No. 12 of the XI Schedule. It has to satisfy the other condition, viz., that it is a domestic

electrical appliance.

9. We have already referred to Item No. 12 of the Xl Schedule in the earlier paragraph. The Explanation to Item No. 12 says ''domestic electrical

appliances'' means electrical appliances normally used in the household and similar appliances used in places such as, hotels, restaurants, hostels,

offices, educational institutions and hospitals. It is neither the case of the revenue nor the assessee that an electric bulb is used only in the household

as it is not only used in the household, hotels, restaurants, hostels, offices, educational institutions and hospitals but also in the streets, other

industrial areas, factories and various other places. The intention of the Legislature under the Explanation is to exclude only those electrical

appliances which are normally used in the household and similar other appliances. Therefore, an electric bulb is used not only in the houses but in

other places, other than those places which are enumerated in the Explanation, therefore, it cannot be said that it is a domestic electrical appliance.

In order to qualify to be a domestic electrical appliance, ail appliance should satisfy the condition that it should be used exclusively as a domestic

appliance. The meaning of ''domestic'' as given in Chambers Dictionary (New Edition) reads as follows:

belonging or relating to the home or family, remaining much at home enjoying or accustomed to being at home. .. .

10. The meaning of the expression ''domestic'' makes it clear that it should be confined to home only. Therefore, the intention of the Legislation in

using the expression ''domestic electrical appliance'' appears to confine the explanation only to those electrical appliances which are exclusively

used for domestic purposes and used for similar purposes in the places enumerated in the said Explanation.

11. We are, therefore, of the view that the Tribunal is right in its view ill holding that the assessee is entitled for investment allowance u/s 32A, in

respect of the plant and machinery used in the manufacture of electric bulbs. We, therefore, answer the question referred in the affirmative, in

favour of the assessee and against the revenue,. The reference is answered accordingly.

From The Blog
Moti Ram Deka & Ors vs General Manager, N.E.F. Railways & Ors (1963)
Oct
19
2025

Landmark Judgements

Moti Ram Deka & Ors vs General Manager, N.E.F. Railways & Ors (1963)
Read More
M/s. Orissa Cement Ltd. & Others vs State of Orissa & Others (1991)
Oct
19
2025

Landmark Judgements

M/s. Orissa Cement Ltd. & Others vs State of Orissa & Others (1991)
Read More