Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals and Fertilizers

Madras High Court 18 Sep 2002 Tax Case No. 386 of 1997 (2003) 261 ITR 80
Bench: Division Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Tax Case No. 386 of 1997

Hon'ble Bench

R. Jayasimha Babu, J; K. Raviraja Pandian, J

Advocates

T. Ravikumar, for the Appellant; P.P.S. Janardhana Raja, for the Respondent

Acts Referred

Income Tax Act, 1961 — Section 37(3A)

Judgement Text

Translate:

R. Jayasimha Babu, J.@mdashThe question referred at the instance of the Revenue is,

Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in its conclusion that commission and discounts on

sales amounting to Rs. 9,15,115 should not be taken into account while considering the disallowance u/s 37(3A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ?

2. The assessment year is 1985-86.

3. The assessee-company is a public limited company engaged in the manufacture of soda ash and ammonium chloride. It had incurred an

expenditure of Rs. 9,15,115 in the relevant previous year towards commission and discounts on sales to its dealers. Its claim that that amount is

outside the scope of Section 37(3A) of the Income Tax Act, inasmuch as commissions and discounts did not amount to sales promotion expense,

was negatived by the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner, but was allowed by the Tribunal.

4. The term ""sales promotion"" is not to be confused with the sales actually effected. While ""sales promotion"" are measures taken by the assessee to

pro- mote generally the sales of the products manufactured by it, or dealt with by it, individual sales made in the normal course of business on

commercial terms either directly to the customer, or through its wholesale and other dealers to whom, under the terms of trade discounts and

commissions are allowed, cannot be regarded as sales promotion.

5. This court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. India Pistons Ltd., has held that sale of a product at a discount did not amount to a

sales promotion expense. It was observed in that judgment that (page 280) :

The sales promotion normally refers to an activity which is intended to promote the sale of all the products by way of advertisement or special

campaigns. Offering a discount on the price in effect is only an instant of the sale of the company''s product at a lower price and cannot be

regarded as expenditure on sales promotion.

6. The question referred to us is required to be, and is answered against the Revenue, and in favour of the assessee.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Reviews Forest Rights Act Protecting Livelihoods
Oct
24
2025

Story

Supreme Court Reviews Forest Rights Act Protecting Livelihoods
Read More
Patna HC: Promotions Valid Only from Actual or DPC Date
Oct
24
2025

Story

Patna HC: Promotions Valid Only from Actual or DPC Date
Read More