M. Narayanaswamy Vs The Assistant Engineer, O and M/CEDC-North, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and P. Rajasekaran

Madras High Court 22 Jun 2011 Writ Petition No. 14415 of 2011
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition No. 14415 of 2011

Hon'ble Bench

M. Jaichandren, J

Advocates

R. Munuswamy, for the Appellant; G. Vasudevan, for R1, for the Respondent

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

M. Jaichandren, J.@mdashHeard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the

first Respondent.

2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the

first Respondent is directed to dispose of the application, dated 09.04.2011, on merits, within a specified period.

3. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the first Respondent, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court.

4. In view of the submissions made by the learned Counsels appearing on either side, the first Respondent is directed to dispose of the application,

dated 09.04.2011, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the second Respondent, as well as the other persons concerned, on merits and in

accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of

the application, dated 09.04.2011, to the first Respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order,

has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

From The Blog
Supreme Court to Rule on Multi-State Societies in IBC Cases
Oct
25
2025

Story

Supreme Court to Rule on Multi-State Societies in IBC Cases
Read More
Supreme Court: Minors Can Void Property Sales by Guardians
Oct
25
2025

Story

Supreme Court: Minors Can Void Property Sales by Guardians
Read More